Welcome to fletrix.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Russia
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 5 9 13 1 30
Featured list FL 1 2 3
Good article GA 3 3 5 17 1 29
B 78 117 139 115 28 477
C 20 48 82 322 11 483
Start 39 147 507 1459 341 2493
Stub 12 67 371 1626 2740 4816
List 3 4 19 196 14 236
Assessed 157 391 1133 3750 3136 8567
Unassessed 1 4 7 5 2360 2377
Total 158 395 1140 3755 5496 10944

Welcome to the assessment department of the Russia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Russia. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Russia}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Russia articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Russia WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Russia}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Russia
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

[edit] Quality scale

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Russia.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Mongolian language has been substantially reworked. Would be nice if a worded assessment could be given on the talk page as well, so that problematic points can easily be identified.
  2. List of Russian chess players has been created. Needs a rating on the importance scale, and any suggestions for the improvement of the list on the talk page would be welcome, too. ScottM84 (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. Marat Shterin - new article Peter Robinson Scott (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Nabat is a newly created article. Suggestions for improvement are welcome.

[edit] Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

[edit] July 8, 2009

[edit] July 4, 2009

[edit] June 30, 2009

[edit] June 25, 2009

[edit] June 20, 2009

[edit] June 16, 2009

[edit] June 10, 2009

[edit] June 6, 2009

[edit] June 2, 2009

[edit] May 18, 2009

[edit] May 14, 2009

Log truncated as it is too huge!

[edit] Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.



Contact with WP Russia
See also: assessed article categories. Last update: July 8, 2009
Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs