Welcome to fletrix.com on July 5 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography
General information (edit · changes)
Announcements
Departments
Work groups
Things you can do (edit)
Biography article statistics

This list is generated automatically on alternate nights.
view full worklist

Biography
articles		 Importance
Top None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 21 609 630
Featured list FL 80 80
A-Class article A 1 26 27
Good article GA 23 1455 1478
B 114 14829 14943
C 40 5216 5256
Start 1 133701 133702
Stub 384940 384940
List 380 380
Assessed 200 541236 541436
Unassessed 174962 174962
Total 200 716198 716398
Shortcut:
WP:PEER
WP:PEER redirects here. For Peer review, see Wikipedia:Peer review (WP:PR).

This WikiProject primarily aims to standardise pages about peerages and baronetcies in the United Kingdom and Ireland (including the former states of England, Scotland, and Great Britain), and their holders.

Contents

[edit] Peerage

[edit] Pages on peerages

A page about a particular title (such as Duke of Norfolk or Earl of Derby) may include the following information:

  • The history of the title and associated titles
  • The remainder (i.e., the rule for inheritance of the title)
  • A list of the holders of the titles and of the associated titles.

Titles should only share articles when one is totally connected to the other: no one has ever been Marquess of Tavistock without being Duke of Bedford, for instance, so information on the former title should be in the latter's article, but there should be separate articles on, for instance, Earl of Arundel and Duke of Norfolk, Earl of Cardigan and Marquess of Ailesbury, Earl of Bedford and Duke of Bedford. If titles share an article, the article should be at the highest title, except when there is a lesser currently extant title: Duke of Bolton, for instance, should redirect to Marquess of Winchester, since the latter is extant.

The history should note the creation or creations of the titles in question, and should also indicate if the circumstances under which any peerage of a previous creation ended: forfeiture, extinction, etc. The article should note the subsidiary titles, and any courtesy titles used.

The list could be formatted as follows, with Earl of Anyplace a title associated with Duke of Somewhere, the article being at "Duke of Somewhere":

[edit] Earls of Anyplace, first Creation (1700–1750)

  • A B C D, 1st Earl of Anyplace (d. 1725)
  • A B C D, 2nd Earl of Anyplace (1675–1750)

[edit] Earls of Anyplace, second Creation (1800—)

  • A B C D, 1st Earl of Anyplace (1750–1825)
  • A B C D, 2nd Earl of Anyplace (1775–1850)
  • A B C D, 3rd Earl of Anyplace (1800–1875) (created Duke of Somewhere in 1860)

[edit] Dukes of Somewhere (1860—)

  • A B C D, 1st Duke of Somewhere (1800–1875)
  • A B C D, 2nd Duke of Somewhere (1825–1900)
  • A B C D, 3rd Duke of Somewhere (b. 1900)

The years listed next to the titles are the years of creation and extinction etc. (if applicable), while the remaining are birth and death dates.

Use: c. for circa; b. for born; d. for died; and second Creation, etc, to indicate more than one creation of the same title.

After the list, the current heirs should be listed, in this format:

Heir Apparent: A B C D, Marquess of Elsewhere (b. 1930)

Lord Elsewhere's Heir Apparent: A B C D, Earl of Anywhere (b. 1960)

[edit] Pages on peers

[edit] Location

A peer's article should be at "Name, (Ordinal) Rank (of) Title (for example, John Howard, 1st Duke of Norfolk, William Whitelaw, 1st Viscount Whitelaw, Charlie Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton), except in cases where the title is never (or hardly ever) used. This normally applies in two situations:

  • when the title holder did not use the peerage (Bertrand Russell, not "Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell"; Richard Needham, not "Richard Needham, 6th Earl of Kilmorey")
  • when the pre-ennoblement name of a peer is exclusively used in normal usage, often when the peerage was a retirement honour (Clement Attlee, not "Clement Attlee, 1st Earl Attlee"; P. D. James, not "P. D. James, Baroness James of Holland Park")

In both cases, the peerage can be used when necessary for disambiguation, and should always be preferred over parenthetical disambiguation (Douglas Hogg, 3rd Viscount Hailsham, not "Douglas Hogg (politician)" or similar).

Notes:

[edit] Content

Articles on peers should start with the peer's full name and highest title(s) in bold, followed by linked post-nominal letters, separated from the name and each other by commas, and then the dates of birth and death in brackets as usual. For example, the article on Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, should start:

Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, KG, GCB, GCH, PC, FRS (c. 1 May 1769 – 14 September 1852) was...

As the code shows, each set of post-nominal letters links to the appropriate article:

'''Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington''', [[Order of the Garter|KG]], [[Order of the Bath|GCB]], [[Royal Guelphic Order|GCH]], [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|PC]], [[Royal Society|FRS]] ([[circa|c.]] [[1 May]] [[1769]] – [[14 September]] [[1852]]) was...

If a peer bore courtesy titles before succeeding, these should be mentioned at the beginning, after the dates of birth and death. For example, the article on a fictional peer might begin:

John Henry William Smith, 6th Marquess of Somewhere, KG, PC (born 22nd March 1932), styled Viscount Anywhere until 1954 and Earl of Elsewhere between 1954 and 1983, is...

The styles a peer held over the course of his life should be contained in a "Styles" section of the article. For example, with the fictional peer above:

  • Viscount Anywhere (1932–1954)
  • Earl of Elsewhere (1954–1983)
  • The Most Hon. The Marquess of Somewhere (1983–1989)
  • The Most Hon. The Marquess of Somewhere, PC (1989–1998)
  • The Most Hon. The Marquess of Somewhere, KG, PC (1998—)

Notes:

  • Honorific prefixes should not be used. For Royal peers and peeresses their styles should be contained in a style box template (see Template:Infobox hrhstyles).
  • "Sir" is not used before the name of a peer who is also a knight or a baronet.
  • The post-nominal abbreviation "Bt" for "Baronet" should not be used with peers.
  • Titles and prefixes issuing from sources other than the Crown and the Church (for example, "Dr" and "Professor") should not be used with peers.
  • As in the article title, wives of Barons should be termed "Baroness" in the opening.
  • The highest title should always be used at the beginning of the article, even if a lesser one is used in the article title.
  • Unlike in the article title, when a peer holds one or more other peerages of the same rank as his most senior peerage, they should all be used in the opening, with a connecting "and" if appropriate ("7th Earl of X and 5th Earl of Y", or "7th Earl of X, 5th Earl of Y and 2nd Earl Z").
  • Peers who are Privy Counsellors should have the post-nominal "PC" (linked to Privy Council of the United Kingdom) placed after their name and title.

[edit] Succession

Succession to peerages should be shown by succession boxes, which are created by the appropriate templates (see Template:S-start and Template:Succession box). All peerages with different predecessors or successors should have individual boxes, as should those held at different dates. For example:


New creation Earl of Somewhere
1942 – 1997		 Extinct
Preceded by
John Smith		 Viscount Smith
1927 – 1997		 Succeeded by
Henry Smith

Titles should be listed in descending order of seniority (in contrast to succession boxes for offices, which are listed in ascending chronological order).

Succession boxes for offices, when these are held by peers, should refer to them by title, masking a link to the actual article. The style used is "The Earl of Somewhere", "The Lord Elsewhere", etc. In cases where this is ambiguous, where offices have been held successively by successive holder of the same title, the numeral should be added:

Preceded by
The 5th Duke of Omnium		 Lord Lieutenant of Barsetshire
1917 – 1942		 Succeeded by
The 7th Duke of Omnium

For more specific examples, see Template talk:Succession box. See also the guidelines on succession boxes here, which also include examples for peers.

[edit] References to peers

[edit] In text

In familial references (when stating who someone's father, mother, brother, etc. was), and in non-contemporaneous references (i.e. references to time periods different to that of the narrative), peers should be referred to as, for example, "the 7th Marquess of Salisbury" (henceforth "the full form"). In other situations, peers should usually be referred to simply as, for instance, "Lord Salisbury" (henceforth "the short form"), both when mentioned in other articles and in their own articles, unless it is important that their exact rank or numeral is stated, in which case the full form should be used (i.e. both the rank and the numeral). Dukes are "the 12th Duke of Devonshire" in their full form and "the [[Peregrine Cavendish, 12th Duke of Devonshire|Duke of Devonshire]]" otherwise. Second and subsequent reference should be to "Lord Salisbury" or "Salisbury" ("the Duke" or "Devonshire" for Dukes). Their wives have the same form of reference, save that ordinals are obviously omitted and the usage of the title alone should not be used: "Lady Salisbury" or "the Duchess".

Notes:

  • Peers below the rank of Duke should not be referred to by their rank alone: "the Marquess said...", "the Earl went...", etc., should never be used.
  • Male life peers should be referred to as "the Lord Title" in full form, not "the Baron Title".
  • Peers whose titles are in the form "X of Y" should always be referred to by the full title, if a title is used, but use of the X alone, without a preceding "Lord" or "Lady", is fine. Example: the Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare should be called "Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare" or "Archer", but never "Lord Archer".
  • Peers whose titles are in the form "X and Y" are referred to at second mention by the X alone, e.g. the 18th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne is "Lord Strathmore" at second mention.
  • Life peeresses should be referred to as "the Baroness Title" in full form, but simply "Lady Title" in running text.

[edit] In lists

Peers should appear in lists either in the form used in the article title (substituting a different peerage if appropriate for the time period in question) or by their correct style (see Forms of Address in the United Kingdom). Usual practice is to use the full form for historical lists (e.g. lists of incumbents of a particular office) and the correct style for contemporary lists (e.g. lists of current Privy Counsellors or members of the House of Lords), but usage is by no means consistent, and the form considered most appropriate for a particular list should be used (more graphical lists tend to use the correct style for aesthetic reasons).

[edit] Baronetage

[edit] Articles on baronetcies

Articles on baronetcies should be sorted by surname, i.e. all baronetcies held by people with a particular surname should share an article, regardless of whether they are actually related. The article should be at "Surname Baronets", e.g. Mount Baronets. They should have a very similar format to articles on peerages (and, indeed, if a noble family held a baronetcy before a peerage, it should be included as if a previous peerage). The article should thus be in the following format:

[edit] Smith Baronets, of London (1750—)

  • Sir John Smith, 1st Baronet (1700–1775)
  • Sir Henry Arthur Smith, 2nd Baronet (1725–1800)
  • Sir Robert Henry Alexander Smith, 3rd Baronet (1750–1825) (created Baron Smith in 1815)

[edit] Barons Smith (1815—)

  • Robert Henry Alexander Smith, 1st Baron Smith (1750–1825)

etc.

[edit] Articles on baronets

[edit] Location

Baronets should generally be at their simple name; for example, Robert Peel. When necessary for disambiguation (as is often necessary, as these families tend to reuse names), the baronetcy can be included in the article title in the form "Sir Forename Surname, Ordinal Baronet"; for example, Sir William Mount, 1st Baronet and Sir William Mount, 2nd Baronet. (The 3rd Baronet, Ferdinand Mount, would not be at "Sir Ferdinand Mount, 3rd Baronet" even if he used the title, as it is not necessary for disambiguation.) The baronetcy alone should not be used for disambiguation without the preceding "Sir": "John Smith" or "Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet" are fine, but "John Smith, 17th Baronet" should not be used.

[edit] Content

Articles should start with the name and "Ordinal Baronet" in bold, followed as with other people by post-nominal letters. For example:

Sir John Henry Smith, 5th Baronet, VC, MC (1 January 1900 – 31 December 1970) was a British war hero...

[edit] References

Baronets, as with knights, should be referred to as "Sir John Smith", and afterwards as "Sir John" or "Smith". Again as with knights, the "Sir" should be included in the link, even if not in the article title; e.g. [[John Smith|Sir John Smith]]. The numeral and "Baronet" should normally not be included in text (e.g. [[Sir John Smith, 7th Baronet|Sir John Smith]]), except when making familial references or when confusion might otherwise arise.

[edit] Succession

As with peers, boxes should be used. They should be formatted like this:


Preceded by
New Creation		 Baronet
(of London)
1800 – 1850		 Succeeded by
John Smith

The code may look like either of these two examples, depending on the templates used (left column: Template:Succession box; right column: Template:S-start):

{{start box}}
{{succession box |
   title=[[Smith Baronets|Baronet]]<br />'''(of London)|
   before=New Creation|
   after=[[Sir John Smith, 2nd Baronet|John Smith]]|
   years='''1800 – 1850 }}
{{end box}}

{{s-start}}
{{s-new|creation}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Smith Baronets|Baronet]]<br />'''(of London)|years='''1800 – 1850}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Sir John Smith, 2nd Baronet|John Smith]]}}
{{end}}

[edit] To Do List

  • Enlist further Wikipedians
  • Create a WikiPolicy about the format of the Baronetcy pages and an example. And decide the standard format for Baronetcy pages where the baronetcy is merged into a peerage.

Currently working on:

Then

[edit] About our lists and the tables below

The List of extant Baronetcies is a list of every current or extant baronetcy, including currently unproven ones. They used to be in separate pages for each kind (NS, UK, etc.), but now are all on one page, with separate tables for each kind. The tables themselves (on the List of extant Baronetcies) are ordered strictly by precedence, i.e., the official number in the first column, which is based on the full date of creation.

Note to editors: If we have a number wrongly, please correct it.

The "List of baronetcies of . . ." lists are meant to become a complete list of every baronetcy that has ever existed, including not only the current/extant baronetcies, but also all extinct baronetcies and currently unproven and dormant baronetcies.

The two sets of lists therefore are not exactly reflexive; rather, the extant lists are a subset of the Complete lists, and sorted by date.

The tables are merely tools to assist us in keeping track of current tasks.

[edit] Adding the remaining extant baronetcies to the "complete" lists

A "Not done" in the column means that it needs a volunteer to compare our now-finished extant list to the various Lists of baronetcies, adding the appropriate missing Baronetcies to the latter. When you've completed a task, please change the appropriate "Not done" to a "done" in the table below so to that we can celebrate!

Table Notes
List of extant Baronetcies All listed
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia done
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of England done
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Ireland done
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Great Britain done
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom Not done

[edit] Adding the Unproven baronetcies to our lists

Resolved.

A "No" in the column means that it needs a volunteer to compare our now-finished extant list to the various Lists of baronetcies, adding the appropriate missing Baronetcies to the latter. Please do not put as of June 2006 or by the Registrar of the Baronetage on the lists (1) because SCB will be changing their website and many were dormant/unproven/under review before and (2) because Lists is going to be seriously too long in any event. When you've completed a task, please change the appropriate "No" to a "Yes" in the table below so to that we can celebrate!

Table A-G H-L M-S T-Z Peers
List of extant Baronetcies Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of England Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Ireland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Great Britain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Complete List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

[edit] Adding the Rayment baronetcies to our lists

A "No" in this table means that a volunteer needs to compare the list with Rayment (made easy by the links above each table) and add missing info to our list. The tables correspond to the pages in Rayment.

For each baronetcy listed in Rayment:

  • check to see if it's listed on our list(s) - meaning List of (each) and (if it is extant) List of extant Baronetcies. If not, add it. Be sure you insert it in the proper order for that list! The Extant Lists are by creation date; the Complete Lists are alphabetical.
  • check/add the full creation date
  • check/add a note on the status, and whether the holder is also a peer, as appropriate for the particular list you're working on. Some are shown as Dormant on Baronetage of (each) and as Extant on List of (each) - in which case Extant should be changed to Dormant.
  • create the appropriate page called e.g. Abdy Baronets.

When you've completed comparing a page in Rayment with one of our lists below, please change the "No" to a "Yes" in the table below so that we can celebrate!

  • So far, only Abdy (meaning Abdy to Anson) and Anstruther (meaning the remaining "A"s) have been listed below, so one of us needs to create all the others. The "labels" (e.g. Abdy, Anstruther, etc) were determined from Rayment's page.

[edit] Abdy-Anson

  • All done

[edit] Anstruther-Ayshcombe

  • All done

[edit] Backhouse-Barratt

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Backhouse Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bacon Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Badd Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baddeley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baden-Powell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bagge Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bagot Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bailey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baillie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baird Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baker Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baker-Wilbraham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bale Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Balfour Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Ball Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bamburgh Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bampflyde Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Banbury Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Banks Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Banner Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bannerman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barber Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barbour Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barclay Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baring Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barker Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barker-Mill Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barkham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barling Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barlow Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barnardiston Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barnewall Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barnham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barnston Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baron Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barr Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barran Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barratt Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Barret-Benyon

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Barret Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barrett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barrett-Lennard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barrie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barrington Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barron Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barrow Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barry Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barlett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barttelot Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Barwick Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bass Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baset Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bastard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bate Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bateman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bates Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bateson Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bath Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Batho Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bathurst Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baxter Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bayly Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Baynes Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bayning Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bayntun-Rolt Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bayntun-Sandys Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bazley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beale Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beardmore Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beauchamp Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beaumont Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Becher Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beck Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beckett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beckwith Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bedell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bedingfield Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beecham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beevor Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beit Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Belasyse Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bellew Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bellingham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bellot Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bendish Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Benn Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bennet Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bennett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bensley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Benyon Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Beresford-Blount

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Beresford Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beresford-Peirse Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Berkeley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bernard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Berney Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Berry Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bertie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Best-Shaw Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Betenson Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bethell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bethune Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Betterton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Beynon Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bibby Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bickerton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bickley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Biddulph Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Biggs Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bilsland Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bindlosse Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bingham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birch Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birchenough Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bird Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birdwood Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birkbeck Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birkin Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Birkmyre Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bisshopp Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Black Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blackadder Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blackett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blackham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blackwell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blackwood Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blades Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blair Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blake Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blaker Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blakiston Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bland Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bland-Sutton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blane Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blaquiere Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blennerhasset Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blois Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blomefield Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blount Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Blundell-Boyle

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Blundell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blunden Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blunt Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Blyth Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boevey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boileau Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boles Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bolles Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bolton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bond Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bonham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bonsor Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boord Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boot Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Booth Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boothby Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boreel Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Borlase Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Borough Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Borrowes Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Borthwick Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Borwick Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bossom Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boswall Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boswell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boteler Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boughey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boughton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boulen Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boulton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bourke Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bourne Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bouverie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bovey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowater Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowden Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowen Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowen-Jones Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bower Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowlby Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowles Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowring Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowyer Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bowyer-Smyth Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boxall Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boyce Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boyd Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Boyle Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Boynton-Browne

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Boynton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brabazon Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bracewell-Smith Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bradford Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bradshaigh Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bradstreet Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brady Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Braham Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brain Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Braithwaite Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bramhall Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bramwell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brassey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brenton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brereton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brickwood Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bridgeman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bridges Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brigges Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Briggs Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bright Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brinckman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brisbane Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brisco Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Briscoe Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broadbent Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broadbridge Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broadhurst Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brocklebank Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brocklehurst Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brodie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brograve Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broke Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broke-Middleton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bromfield Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bromhead Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bromley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brooke Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brookes Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brooks Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brooksbank Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brotherton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Broughton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brougn Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brown Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Browne Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Brownlow-Byng

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Brownlow Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brownrigg Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bruce Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bruce-Gardner Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brudenell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brunner Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brunton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Brydges Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buchan-Hepburn Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buchanan Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buchanan-Jardine Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buck Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buckley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buckworth-Herne-Soame Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bulkeley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bull Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buller Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bullock Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bullough Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bunbury Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Bunce Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burbidge Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burden-Sanderson Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burdett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burgess Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burgoyne Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burke Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burnaby Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burne-Jones Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burnett Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burney Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burns Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burrard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burrell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burroughs Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burrows Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Burton-Chadwick Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buswell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Butcher Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Butler Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Butlin Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Butt Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Button Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buxton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Buzzard Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Byass Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Byng Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Cable-Alexander-Cavendish

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Cable-Alexander Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cadell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cahn Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cain Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Caine Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Caird Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cairnes Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Calder Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Caldwell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Call Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Callender Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Calthorp Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Calverley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cambell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cameron Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cameron-Ramsay-Fairfax-Lucy Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Campbell Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Campbell-Orde Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cann Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carbutt Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carden Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carew Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cargill Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carleton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carlile Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carmichael Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carnegie Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carpentier Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carr Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Carteret Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cartier Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cary Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cassel Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Castleton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cathcart Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Catto Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cautley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cave Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cave-Browne-Cave Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cavendish Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Cawley-Clavering

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
Cawley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cayley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cayzer Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chad Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chadwyck-Healey Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chalmers Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chaloner Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chamberlain Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chamberlayne Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Champion de Crespigny Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Champneys Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chance Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Channing Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chaplin Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chapman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chardin Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Charles Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Charleton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Charlton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chatterton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chaytor Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cheere Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chernock Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chester Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chetwode Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chetwynd Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cheyne Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chichester Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Child Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chinnery Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chisholm Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chitty Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cholmeley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Cholmondeley Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Christison Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chubb Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chudleigh Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Church Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Churchman Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Chute Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clarges Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clark Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clarke Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clarke-Jervoise Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clarke-Travers Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Claughton Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
Clavering Baronets ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Clay

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Conroy

Baronetcy Terr des Which Date Extant On List of On B of Bartcy page
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No
?........ ?...... ?... ?... ?.. ?.. No No

[edit] Double barrelled names and mergers with other titles

Where there is a double barrelled name, eg Harbord-Hamond a page should be created called Harbord-Hamond Baronets. That page should have [[Category:Baronetcies]] on it, even if it redirects to another name - as Harbord-Hamond redirects to Baron Suffield (but might have redirected to Hamond). It is intended that all family surnames should be listed in [[Category:Baronetcies]].

For alphabetizing, please use the last name listed, e.g., Home-Purves-Hume-Campbell should be in lists at Campbell. This policy is up for discussion on the project's discussion page.

[edit] Useful pages

The following are some categories that may be placed on any Wikipedia article relating to baronets. When using, remember to remove the first semi-colon.

[edit] Categories

[edit] Lists

[edit] Stubs

[edit] Sources of Information

include:

[edit] Article statistics

Index · Statistics · Log

Biography (peerage)
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 13 4 2 4 24
Good article GA 1 6 4 4 10 25
B 8 17 75 58 138 296
C 5 9 21 13 58 106
Start 1 16 133 1036 1290 2476
Stub 2 157 767 3757 4683
List 2 6 8
Assessed 16 63 394 1882 5263 7618
Unassessed 1 1
Total 16 63 394 1882 5264 7619

[edit] Userboxes

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peerage_and_Baronetage"
Personal tools
Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs