Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images)

Blatant copyright violations or files missing source or license information may be "speedied"

If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the file may be speedy deleted under criterion F9 (formerly I9). Please tag the file with {{subst:db-f9|url=source URL}} and warn the user with {{Nothanks-sd}}.

If a file is missing source, evidence of permission, or license information, place either use:

{{subst:nsd}} for no source
{{subst:nld}} for no license

or

{{subst:npd}} for No evidence of permission

on the description page to put the file in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the file will be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 4 or criterion 11 for images/media.

Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s). The templates {{subst:Image source|File:file name}} and {{image copyright}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own. It is not necessary to warn the uploader about every individual image if they have uploaded several such images, but at least one message telling them that images without source/license will be deleted should be given to each user.

If a file is indisputably non-free, and its possible use can comply with our non-free content policy, be bold and retag it as a non-free image with an appropriate tag instead of taking it to this page.

Please note that this page is not for disputing the fair use of already non-free media, but for the disputing if a freely licensed image really is free. Please take queries of this nature to Files for deletion or Non-free content review

Contents

1 Instructions
2 Holding cell
3 New listings

Shortcuts: WP:PUI WP:PUF

This page is for listing and discussing images that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Images are listed here for 14 days before they are processed. Images that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.

[edit] Instructions

Deletion templates (policy · log)

{{copyvio}}Copyvios (howto · log)
{{ifd}}Images (log)
{{rfd}}Redirects (howto · log)
{{md1}}Miscellaneous (howto · log)
{{delrev}}Deletion review

Articles (howto · log)

Templates (howto · log)

Categories (howto · log)

{{db-author}} {{db-web}}
{{db-nonsense}} {{db-test}}
{{db-nocontext}} {{db-empty}}
{{db-attack}} {{db-catempty}}
{{db-band}} {{db-banned}}
{{db-bio}} {{db-notenglish}}
{{db-copyvio}} {{db-repost}}
{{db-vandalism}} {{db-talk}}
{{db-spam}} {{db-nocontent}}
{{db-copypaste}} {{db-filecopyvio}}

All speedy templates

Unfree images

Transwiki (howto · log)

{{Copy to Meta}}
{{Copy to Wikibooks}}
{{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}
{{Copy to Wikiquote}}
{{Copy to Wikisource}}
{{Copy to Wikiversity}}
{{Copy to Wiktionary}}
All transwiki templates

Before listing, remember that files which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.

To list an image on this page:

I	Edit the file page. Add {{pui\|log=2009 July 5}} to the file page. If the file is in use, also add {{puic\|File_name.ext\|log=2009 July 5}} to the caption(s).
II	Create its PUI subsection. Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst`:`pui2\|image=File_name.ext\|reason=reason}} ~~~~ (remember to exclude the File: prefix).
III	Give due notice. Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst`:`idw-pui\|Image_name.ext}} Remember to replace "Image_name.ext" with the name of the file

Unlike Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of an image. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of an image and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.

Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 14 days. Images that are accepted following this fourteen-day period should have {{subst:puir}} added to the image talk page and a copy of the issue and/or discussion that took place here put on the image talk page as well. If no objection to the image's deletion is raised, or no proof that the image is indeed free is provided, the image may be deleted without further notice after the 14-day period.

Note: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more on these). An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.

[edit] Holding cell

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared.

These images have been listed for at least 14 days. Images which have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.

/2009 June 21

[edit] New listings

[edit] June 22

[edit] File:RobertWood.jpg

As a photograph of two-dimensional artwork, we would need to know when it was created to determine whether it is PD for age, or copyrighted by the original artist. Uploader's claim of owning the rights is likely based upon the fact that s/he took this picture, a common mistake. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a photograph of a painting made by Wood's daughter. I don't understand why if I take a picture of another painting that it isn't in the public domain. Such an argument to the contrary would seem quite silly to me. As to the age of the painting; I don't know. I didn't see it labeled on the painting.Chhe (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Do you think this could be considered a derivative work due to the picture of the frame shown?Chhe (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:AmesPainting.jpg

Incorrect licence - Self-taken photo of a probably copyrighted work makes this a derivative work. I could not think of a reasonable rationale to change the licencing Peripitus (Talk) 03:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

As with the above image, the only question is the age of the painting. If the painting itself is in the public domain, the photograph can obviously be so released; if it is not, then the photo cannot be. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I've tried to find out who and when painted this without luck. - Peripitus (Talk) 07:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know who painted it or how old it is.Chhe (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Where is the painting hanging - perhaps they have a website that tells us the age and creator of this portrait ? - Peripitus (Talk) 21:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Brunswick Rifle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:C-101.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission. Website shows photos are copyrighted to EADS. Ecosse99 (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Alexander Radulov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:EmilHamilton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No source. No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Walking On The Chinese Wall.jpg

Listed as CC-self but this appears to be a scan of a copyrighted music cover Peripitus (Talk) 06:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:TheShoppesatChinoHills.jpg

Listed as self-created under a CC-by-SA-3.0 licence but the origional is on flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zefdelgadillo/2516481981/sizes/l/) under a no-derivatives licence. I cannot confirm of course if the flickr licence has been changed . Peripitus (Talk) 07:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Erinmills-aerial.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Is at http://www.flickr.com/photos/franktoth/469445750/ although the image there is smaller and uploaded to WP earlier feydey (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I think the flickr image is a copyvio due to the false claims on it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:QEII Stamp.jpg

Image of a stamp - may be old enough to be PD but without details I cannot tell. I suspect that this is a copyrighted item Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lancaster_postoffice.jpg

Mural is original work - No indication of that works status here Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lancaster_courthouse2.jpg

Copyright in artwork not mentioned.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't get it. It's my own picture, I say so, I say explicitly "Photograph copyright ©2002 by Daniel P. B. Smith. Licensed under the terms of the Wikipedia Copyright," which was the phraseology favored at the time, and I included the GFDL license.

The issue isn't the photograph, it's the artwork you photographed which may have a seperate copyright. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Eagleowl.jpg

See http://www.ansp.org/library/permissions.php - Although if original is PD Bridgmen applies? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Lear died in 1888, so the work is certainly old enough. {{PD-art}} certainly applies. In my opinion, this looks like copyfraud by the ANSP. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:RNAquila profile.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No source. No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:RN F-35.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:RS - Gray 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Randy + Jackson.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Makriev.jpg

Image appears professionally done from field level; relatively low resolution and lack of metadata. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Diawithash.jpg

Low resolusion and may be copy fron website - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 19:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg

This image (which seems to have been taken from an incredibly privileged viewpoint) looks like a screen capture from a video. Although the image is released as PD by the uploader, a website source is given; the image couldn't be found there. The uploader (Max rspct) is a frequent contributor, but he has not responded to requests for clarification. Gump Stump (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ryp-1.jpg

This image was uploaded by RYP, who is the person in the picture. While he is notable, the image is copyrighted by the photographer (Spencer Mandell), so it can't be released under the licenses claimed. - Gump Stump (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Blue_area_islamaba_galleryfull.jpg

CC-BY-SA claim per source site but image has watermarks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:HiddenMickeyKangaroo.JPG

Mickey Mouse is protected design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Protected from what? The artist drew it by himself...so it's a photograph of a freehand drawing of Mickey. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 23:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 23

[edit] File:Erfenschnergen-trip.jpg

Picture uploaded buy user for a personal vacation schedule. It has no value to the project. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Snottywong/trip. Adam in MO Talk 01:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PinterDavidBaron.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wrong forum. Image is marked as copyrighted and this is not disputed. Correct forum for this is WP:FFD. Note that the complainant is currently blocked/banned and further debate is unlikely - Peripitus (Talk) 05:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Fair Use rationale disputed NYScholar (talk) 05:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

There is no identification of the copyright holder of this photograph or identification of the photographer or initial place of publication. It is not clear that this photograph is being used "within fair use" or that the claim that it is "a unique historic image" is accurate (there are others of Harold Pinter when he was using the name David Baron). This image comes from a copyrighted and copyright-protected official website of the subject Harold Pinter (currently owned and maintained by his estate and controlled by his agent, Judy Daish and Associates); please see: Talk:Harold Pinter and the uploader's talk page for further discussion. --NYScholar (talk) 04:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC) (edited. --NYScholar (talk) 07:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The source link is clearly shown in the Image Summary. The fair use rationale satisfies our non-free image policies. There are no known free images of Pinter from the 1950s. -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

As requested by this Bot (whom/which I took to be an administrator), I have added the template I was directed to (a subst one) when I tried to add {{dfu}}. The first one (puic) is no longer on the file image page. --NYScholar (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

That template was removed by an actual person; I have followed that person's suggestion and posted the concerns in another review page. --NYScholar (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:UM infrared comparison.png

As far as I am aware, the Met Office does not release its content under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 09:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Note the image does not originate from the Met Office, although weather data used in the creation of the image did originate from the Met Office. If I said "The Met Office predicted rain today" would I be breaking licensing rules, because that phrase was based upon Met Office data -- I honestly don't know what the rules are. Rnt20 (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Walter Bread Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Company logo, licenced as the user's own work. Jafeluv (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Cllr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Company logo, licenced as the user's own work. Jafeluv (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Metrocrash.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Gawker text is free, but its images are not explicitly free. See this - "Important Note: this does not include the right to republish images from GM sites, for which GM may not the copyright holder, except in the context of a screenshot of the whole site." Copyright status is thus unknown, image should be deleted. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 17:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, Well forget a picture then mark it for deletion. We will never find one for this article then. ZStoler (talk) 17:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

You can still do fair use though. I believe this applies. Calebrw (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Problem with fair use is that we'd first have to establish the ultimate copyright holder. Since Gawker may not be, and doesn't identify who is, it doesn't appear we can establish this. Also, we should be able to find a free photo eventually. A survivor or a witness will likely upload a photo or two over the next few days. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 17:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Sedona-sm.jpg

Photo of 3D artwork - No indication of artwork status Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

My own photo of a public sculpture installed c. 1993. No knowledge of any restrictions on photography of this artwork. Lee M (talk) 03:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

That means the artwork is copyrighted, and US freedom of panorama is buildings only. This will have to go, I'm afraid. Stifle (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Trinity_Thunderbolts.gif

Sports logo- No indication uploader has rights Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ghsmain.jpg

Just because it's in the .us top-level domain doesn't make it a work of the federal government; listing here because I'm not sure what kind of copyright rules govern the work of North Carolina school districts. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ghswhirlie.jpg

Same as above, tagged as PD-USGov but actually the work of a school district in North Carolina. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cyclepaths_Vendée.JPG

Non US Road sign design - No FoP in France? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:TO-Team-Manager.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Hmwith (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

reason Highwayman101 (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Quote from the privacy section on NDS:

Copyright Notice

The material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The Crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms, the Central Office of Information logo and departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Anti-China march routes.PNG

This image is claimed to be self-made, but it looks too professional for it to be so. It's more likely that it was the product of the protest organizers, which was subsequently scanned. Ngchen (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 24

[edit] File:Katja K Black Label 06.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 03:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:KusadoSengen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:PhineasFerbCast.jpg

Sourced to a blog that I am certain is not the copyrightholder - Credited in the exif data to "HARPER SMITH" who appears not the be the blogs author Peripitus (Talk) 05:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I have checked further, a similar image exists on Flickr; however, it is watermarked for a separate fan site similar to the source of the larger image in question. The Flash ^{talk} 16:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Swampy Marsh.jpg

Sourced to a blog that I am certain is not the copyrightholder - Credited in the exif data to "HARPER SMITH" who appears not the be the blogs author Peripitus (Talk) 05:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Vincent Martella.jpg

Sourced to a blog that I am certain is not the copyrightholder - Credited in the exif data to "HARPER SMITH" who appears not the be the blogs author Peripitus (Talk) 06:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Dan Povenmire.jpg

Sourced to a blog that I am certain is not the copyrightholder - Credited in the exif data to "HARPER SMITH" who appears not the be the blogs author Peripitus (Talk) 06:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Still, however, the image has never been used anywhere else. Clearly, the person was given it by the photographer and it is therefore under the public domain, right? The Flash ^{talk} 15:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Tatsuha.gif

This is a character from a copyrighted anime/manga series Gravitation. ···日本穣^? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Uploads by Wneedham02

Given the fact, that this user uplaods several unfree files in the past, see User talk:Wneedham02 my good faith ends here. Some evidence:

The Users very first upload was a copyright violation from www.xtinaweb.org. This was delted, he then started to upload images he created himself... why should he upload copyright violations if he have own images? That does not make sense.
This PUI request nominates only the rest of a large number of uploads already deleted because of copyright infringement, wrong authorship claims or blatant copyright violation.
We have a variety of quality here
most images are without EXIF data, the images with EXIF are inconsistent: at least 4 cameras where used, but all photos are self-created.

A list:

I have near zero confidence, that anything is self-created here. --Martin H. (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Fort smith dallas junction.jpg

Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but I doubt many Wikipedians own satellites. Most such sources are copyrighted. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see also File:Fort smith-dallas junction.jpg, which was uploaded by the same editor, suffers from the same issue of a high-altitude sensor / camera / plane / satellite, and may be the same image. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Firezone.gif

Appears to be scan of a playbook or other publication. Source not given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Samungli.PNG

Another satellite image claimed as uploader's own work; actual source not given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sff in 1960.jpg

Uploader claims this is a "scanned image of a book", thus uploader does not own rights. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Sukkur.PNG

Another uploader-"created" satellite image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Shahbaz.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Sargodha.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Birth house-flute.jpg

Looks like a scan of an old image from a book. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Rafiqui Shorkot.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Peshawar.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Pasni.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Nawabshah.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Murid.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Multan.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Mirpur Khas.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Mianwali.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Masroor.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Kamra.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Kohat.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PAF Chander.PNG

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Fort smith-dallas junction.jpg

Another "uploader-created" satellite image with no source given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:44027993 raymond other 300.jpg

This image is from the BBC website, and it is claimed that it is in the public domain because of expired Crown Copyright; however it is unclear where the image was originally from so its copyright status cannot be verified. If it is from the BBC it would probably be BBC copyright, which appears to be different from Crown Copyright. snigbrook (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it at all relevant that the subject of the photo died in 1943? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Stevenguyen4.jpg

Original source is no longer accessible, but it suggests that the uploader is not the copyright holder as stated. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Stevenguyen5.JPG

Same as above; sourced to a page that no longer exists, but probably not the uploader's own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Stevenguyen6.jpg

Same as above; sourced to a page that no longer exists, but probably not the uploader's own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Stevenguyen8.jpg

Same as above; sourced to a page that no longer exists, but probably not the uploader's own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 25

[edit] File:Gillian Signature.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

If this is an official signature, it can't have been created by the uploader (unless the uploader is the person in question). If it isn't the official signature, then Wikipedia shouldn't be using it anyway. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

As I mention below, signatures are PD-ineligible. So, if this is authentic or not (and I see no reason to assume bad faith here with regards to its authenticity), the sole question relevant at PUI is answered. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Oops; I'd forgotten that I'd nominated this one, too. Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Shockgside.jpg

Source listed as a photo session; image is low-res and has no metadata, which seems to indicate it's snagged from a web source somewhere. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm inclined to disagree. I got a funny feeling Shock G took these himself specifically to place on his own Wikipedia article. Bobbygalaxy (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Shockg front.jpg

Same source/author info given as above; same low resolution and lack of metadata to arouse suspicion. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] File:Amador Robotics AUV Deployment.jpg

Source gives no indication that the image is so released. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I have written permission from the author of the photo, how do I prove this? Deltawk (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I am the author of the image in question, I have updated the footer of the site (www.tchips.com) to indicate the licensing on the image.--Dnaito (talk) 05:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Daniel! This is a big help - thanks for helping me improve the Robotics section on our wiki. Deltawk (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks good. I'll withdraw the listing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Sasol Secunda.jpg

Image description gives no indication that it is a work of the US government. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

My apologies, I will try to remember to include specific citation of the government source in the future. This image is from a paper presented to the Workshop on Gasification Technologies in Indianapolis IN, June 2007, by Daniel Cicero, who is the technology manager of hydrogen and syngas for the National Energy Technology Laboratory, under ot Office of Fossil Energy of the U.S. Department Of Energy. The paper is publicly available here: http://www.gasification.org/Docs/Workshops/2007/Indianapolis/06Cicero%20GTC_June2007.pdf

[edit] File:Violet Vancot.jpg

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Professor Wesley Wiggins.jpg

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jake Johnson.jpg

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Farrah-fawcett.jpg

No copyright info available Willking1979 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:NY382Map.JPG

This image is a crop of the Pennsylvania Department of Highway's 1960 state map at [2], which is a copyrighted image. As a derivative work, this image is equally copyrighted and the given license is blatantly wrong. – T M F 19:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sea lons.JPG

Image taken from Indianapolis Zoo's website [3] and claimed as uploader's own work. This user has uploaded many images with problems of this nature. L P ^talk 21:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Caromuseum.JPG

Taken from website and claimed as own work by uploader. [4] L P ^talk 21:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Brachioentrance.JPG

Taken from website and claimed as uploader's own work. [5] L P ^talk 21:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Old indy zoo.JPG

Organizational logo claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 23:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Museum of indy.JPG

Artist's rendering of proposed construction project, claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 23:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 26

[edit] File:SiCmirror.JPG

License tag claims the image is public domain, and though the image is hosted on NASA's website, the source looks like a Powerpoint presentation given by Trex Enterprises, as their logo is on every page. Shubinator (talk) 00:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and it looks like the image is from page 51 of the source. Shubinator (talk) 00:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:This is my issakar.jpg

Derivative work of promotional image. The source image for this appears in a number of places on the internet. As a derivative work it is not free Peripitus (Talk) 03:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sixteen Cities Wikipedia pic.JPG

This appears to be a professional promotional image (copyrighted and not free) that has been edited to add some text. While I cannot find the original source I am convinced that this is not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 03:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. The file is missing OTRS permission, and is likely a copyright violation. --Kanonkas : Talk 16:21, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Queen-fredrica.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:R11141 26347.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete copyright violation from rediff.com. I don't see any indication it's under a free license. --Kanonkas : Talk 16:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:RaptorJesus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I highly doubt that this user is the copyright holder of this image. Suttna08 (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Pittsboro Mascot.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [6], claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Blue devil.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [7] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:North Salem.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [8] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Pittsboro Elem.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [9] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Tri west middle.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [10] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:High school tw.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from [11] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Tri west.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken from [12] and claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 05:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] June 27

[edit] File:Arabellafield.jpg

Claimed as self-made but the image is used widely on the internet which makes me strongly doubt this Peripitus (Talk) 00:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete copyright violation from IMDB. --Kanonkas : Talk 16:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hawksrfc1.jpg

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Horsa 3-view.jpg

Failed to use OTRS, website contains no release. No evidence of purported email permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Home 4.jpg

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Allachbronzwflag.jpg

Contradictory licencing information: the infobox makes reference to fair use (albeit without a proper rationale), but the copyright tag is {{PD-self}}, which is patently incorrect. Moreover, a fair use claim would not work under WP:NFCC, because presumably it is possible to take freely licenced photos of this artifact.

Note: All image uploads of this user, Nicholasweed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · abuse filter log · block user · block log), seem to have this problem. This notice applies to all of them; this image is listed only as an example. Sandstein 16:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Not all images uploaded my myself have this problem. Many are created by myself and I am the copyright holder. A few others were created by another person that has given me full permission to use the images as I see fit for whatever purpose. I am however working to fix the copyright tags on the images that have problems. I just didn’t know what copyright tag needed to be used because nobody has been telling me how to do things. All my efforts have been through trial and error. I only hope I have found the proper tag for the image in question because it is historically important and relevant to the article that it is included in. I would maybe like to have help fixing the problems if someone can help me. If the images get deleted it would very much so hurt the content and understsnding of the articles that they are in.

">[[User: Nicholasweed|> 14:52, 02 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:3CT YA.jpg.jpg

Delete: This book cover is copyright and cannot be put in the public domain by the uploader, so it is an unused orphan. ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:3CT YA.jpg

Delete: This book cover is copyright and cannot be put in the public domain by the uploader, so it is an unused orphan. ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Michael Jackson's difference in appearance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Image is all over the web, including from [13]. Uploader is clearly not the copyright holder. This image is displayed on a high-profile page, and should be dealt with swiftly. Brianga (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Brianga (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Adriankellard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Image has been deleted twice already. Uploader clearly is not the author. He even admitted working on permission for uploaded image. Wknight94 ^talk 20:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Japan0205.JPG

Image includes Japanese posters used in the Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) article. The uploader (Stevec240) says the image is his copyright. However, the photographed posters are probably Warner Bros' Non-free posters and the rationale for fair use in the article not obvious, because the article text doesn't mention Japan or Tokyo. Uploader hasn't contributed since 2007 so might not respond to messages. Pointillist (talk) 22:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 28

[edit] File:Cincy montage.JPG

"Google"? It is a source, so it isn't speedy-able, but it's only barely better then no source at all. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Downtownsariverlevel.jpg

Like the last image, has a source, but its only barely better than no source at all without more information. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:GerardRed.jpg

Image at source is not the same as this image, so license cannot be verified. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sign-m-sml.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Are signatures PD-ineligible? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, this has been upheld many times--both here and on Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Very good then; thanks for the info. I'll keep it in mind. Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Ross Newell.jpg

No source and no evidence of permission (an unused image of a non-notable person). Memphisto (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:RookeShieldsBackontheBoards008-vi1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RockMFR (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I can't see this being self made. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 16:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Uploader says [14] the source is photobucket.com, but also seems to say[15][16] he found it somewhere (rather than took it) and is unable to find an explicit release of copyrights. This image is all over the internet, so it's possibly impossible to pin down its original. and it's hardly a unique image or a case where this exact one must be used in this context. Someone could upload a personally-taken photo as a free replacement or make a fair-use claim of a screen-cap (whose origin is traceable) for the person in his iconic role. DMacks (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Why can't this be self made? It seems to be a convention setting, and a consumer quality camera. Mintrick (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

FWIW, I've replaced the image in the Billy Mays article with one that's clearly under a cc-by-sa-2.0 license. travisl (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Image of Billy Mays is now considered unable to be reproduced, qualifying it for possible fair use. Mghabmw (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Acehood.jpg

Looks like a professionally taken photo; no evidence that the user owns the copyrights to the image — Σ xplicit 19:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:JerseyPants.JPG

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads. Nothing to indicate this is an original work, especially as it is claimed to be from 2005, yet appears to be from the 70s or 80s. Mosmof (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gearheads01.JPG

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads, nothing to indicate this is any different. Mosmof (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:WideBandJockstrap.JPG

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads, nothing to indicate this is any different. Mosmof (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Danhardyweighin.jpg

Web resolution, previosly uploaded to Flickr by "Outlaw Imaging" (account no longer active, but image can be seen here). One of the users other uploads confirmed copyvio. --aktsu ^(t / c) 20:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Bnnmbvhmkgh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rodhullandemu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Web-resolution, no EXIF-data. Possibly from a video as it is very pixelated. User already uploaded at least one copyvio. --aktsu ^(t / c) 20:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] June 29

[edit] University of Pennsylvania Law School images

[edit] File:Silverman.jpg

Seems to have been copied from here but I'd like another set of eyes on this. Esrever ^(klaT) 02:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:LawSchoolFront2.jpg

Another one that has possibly been lifted right from the law school's site. Esrever ^(klaT) 02:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:CourtyardNight.jpg

Image is also here. Esrever ^(klaT) 02:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PennLawStudents.jpg

Image is also here. Esrever ^(klaT) 02:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sorry-med-1-.jpg

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 03:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Universiadebeg.jpg

Screenshot. Bojan 03:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, it still tagged as public domain with weak fair-use rationale (the image is replaceable) . -- Bojan 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Erica d'Ormus.jpg

Delete there is no evidence that uploader has permission to use this image which has a copyright notice on it. Assuming it is non-free image it is an orphan and must be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kyle Chavarria.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Web resolution, looks like a publicity photo. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:CSDC Disc-Cover.png

Clearly a derivative work. J Milburn (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:CSDC DVD-Case.jpg

Clearly a derivative work. J Milburn (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:A science of virtues.png

Even if this was self-created, which I doubt, it contains non-free elements (logo). J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Alldie.jpeg

Looks like a scan of a newspaper article or something similar. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

It is not a newspaper article, and it says what it is in the caption. It is a scan of a flier distributed freely at a demonstration, and the attribution is in the image itself.Jayzames (talk) 21:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Blakeanddylannow.jpg

Web resolution, looks like a publicity shot. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Seal new bw.gif

I doubt the uploader owns the rights to a city seal. J Milburn (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:VONORMY FLAG2.jpg

I doubt the uploader owns the rights to a city flag. J Milburn (talk) 20:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Wisdom Redifined.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Even if this image is free, which I doubt, it contains non-free elements, such as the logo. J Milburn (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:A science of virtues.jpg

Even if this image is free, which I doubt, it contains non-free elements, such as the logo. J Milburn (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Dig out your soul billboard.jpg

Billboard is presumably copyrighted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I have been careful to not include the image in great detail, the resolution of the billboard is lower then that published. The image also shows more then just the billboard. Mtaylor848 (talk) 22:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- But the billboard is the primary focus of the image. It may qualify under fair use, but I think that it is a derivative work and thus cannot be a free image. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] June 30

[edit] File:OFK Beograd 1 0 Auxerre.jpg

Sourced to uploader, but A) lowish resolution for a self-taken photo, B) No metadata, and C) TinEye turns up another site with similar images. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jerimiahpose.jpg

Declined F4, since tag was added after nomination. Should have a direct URL with information on licensing... right now there doesn't seem to be any evidence of permission. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Rover 400 (1991).jpg

Looks pretty professional/promotional; no metadata; lower resolution than many photos taken by camera and not resized specifically for web use. Suspect copyvio. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The reason why there is no metadata is because I created this photograph a long time ago and cannot accurately give the camera info for this image. This was also added just after I joined wikipedia and didn't know very much about uploading photographs to it as a consequence of this. Please can you tell me about the type of licence that this image will need to remain on wikipedia, as is in use in the article Rover 400 Series as the only uploaded picture of the original Rover 400 model. Dreamweaverjack (talk) 03:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I look and don't see an original photo. I see evidence of reproduction from a printed source. Looking at your other images File:Morris Minor MM Series.jpg, File:Leyland P76.jpg..I see evidence of a misunderstanding about what self-made really means here - Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Pichonbaron97.jpg

The label is presumably copyrighted, making this a derivative work. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Macdonald Memorial.JPG

The United States doesn't have freedom of panorama, so unless this memorial is out of copyright due to age (certainly possible) or a specific release (unlikely), this is a derivative work with copyright being held by the memorial's builder. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Why do you assume that this was taken in the United States? Sir. John A. Macdonald was Canadian. Canada has much more liberal FoP than the USA. Furthermore, he died in 1891. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Image_name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

reason Jayzames (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

This is from a flier distributed at the protests

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Terrapene ornata face.jpg

"I think this image is a copyright violation, despite the tag, unless the uploader is the owner. -Falcon8765 (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)"

The image is marked with a copyright tag in the top left, and is said to be taken from the Texas Park and Wildlife website. No evidence that the author, Roland311 has the permission to post this material to the public domain. NW (Talk) 04:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Image_name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

reason Nicholasweed (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC) This photo file should not be deleted because of “Fair use, Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary.” This is important to show this photo in the article because it is of the only known bronze cast Allach SS Flag Bearer by Theodor Karner. This item came out of the personal estate of Industrialist Franz Nagy had owned the land since 1925 that the Munich-Allach facility was built on. Nagy helped creat the porcelain factory Porzellan Manufaktur Allach. Examples of porcelain Allach SS Flag Bearer by Theodor Karner can still be found for sale for around $20,000 if one comes up for sale. This is the only one that might have been cast in bronze at all. It would be a shame to have this photo of this one of a kind artwork deleted from this article.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Mia Michaels2007.JPG

Listed as PD-self but this is a professional image that I can see copies of in various places on the internet including a low-res version here. I may be wrong but I don't think that the uploader owns this photo....if they do my sincerest thanks for uploading such a stunning image Peripitus (Talk) 06:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

==== File:BBC_satellite_regions.png ==== Image is listed as both PD and GFDL, claimed to be from ukfree.tv but no licensing confirmation is available there. I can't even find the original image URL to be honest. This is a useful image but if we can't figure out where it came from or whether it's properly licensed we might have to scrap it. RabidDeity (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Strike this, I miscategorized it. RabidDeity (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hairdo.jpg

Image also appears in a different format here. Without further provenance I think this is not user-taken Peripitus (Talk) 12:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Santos jack.jpg

Professional image uploaded by a user who has taken images from various soccer websites. Web resolution, professional quality, no exif, past history.....I don't think this is self-made nor public domain Peripitus (Talk) 12:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Tornado intercept vehicle mark 1.jpg

Template says "Ken Dewey allows anyone to use [this photo] for any purpose provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed", but the original source simply says "All Photos © Ken Dewey, SNRR, UNL, unless otherwise noted." - no evidence that he's released it for free, commercial use. McGeddon (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:SK book cover 8.jpg

File would seem to be a scan from a book according to the file's title. If so, it appears to be a recent book which surely wouldn't be public domain. If the uploader is the author of the book and the person in the image, he needs to provide permission to OTRS. Image is also orphaned. Uploader also originally uploaded the same image 12 minutes later at File:SKPhoto.jpg. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here} 18:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment: appears to be a photograph of Sebastian Kappen. To expand on the "personal collection" comment, see the comment on the most recent file that was uploaded: "I am Dr. Sebastian Kappen's nephew and this photo of his is from my personal collection of photos. Prof. Sebastian Vattamattam". It should also be pointed out, for what it's worth, that this photo represents one of several GFDL-significant contributions by the uploader User:Ase, a username the nominator is presently attempting to usurp. –xeno^talk 18:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Nice and interesting find. Wouldn't the image still not be in the public domain if it was the cover of a book? Wouldn't his nephew need to provide OTRS? No problems with withdrawing this if these questions can be satisfied. Not sure what the usurp has to do with it. Not a conspiracy here, I just noticed the issue I've raised while looking at the account's edits and contributions. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here} 19:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Not sure, I'll leave that to those more capable in copyright venues. However, it doesn't look like a book cover, it was perhaps just mis-named. –xeno^talk 19:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Can of White Fungus.jpg

The moire effect and color/contrast give it away: this image was obviously ripped from TV. No attribution information is given in the description. The image has been uploaded before as both Image:White Fungus Can Image.jpg and Image:Can of White Fungus.jpeg. These images were flagged as unlicensed and unattributed back on January 1, 2009, before both were apparently deleted. (See [17]. RabidDeity (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ancient nubians.jpg

Uploader of this file has 10 counts of copyvios and this file looks most certainly like another one of them as it is lacking the written proof of permission sought from the aforementioned "Oriential Institude Chicago" for reuse on wikipedia. He was warned by me that any further violation would result in him being brought to the attention of an administrator for severely disrupting wikipedia due to his personal actions. Further attempt to confirm the possibility of the file being authorized for reuse was promptly removed by the uploader on his talker page (User talk:AncientObserver) for unknown reasons. Hence, the file being brought to the attention here. Dave1185 (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Dave comes to my talk page every once in awhile to make condescending remarks and warn me about images I uploaded months ago. I have already told him that I will try to do a better job with providing the appropriate copyright info for images and I have not uploaded an image since. I am new to Wikipedia and did not fully understand how the copyright policy worked. I'm not here to be disruptive all I have ever done is tried to be constructive. AncientObserver (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] July 1

[edit] File:President Nasheed of the Maldives.jpg

2 issues here: The actual source page, http://www.flickr.com/photos/voteanniphotos/2983626113/ has this image listed as copyrighted. Second, the Summary says the file is ok per the permission stated at http://www.flickr.com/people/voteanniphotos/ however that is incorrect. The permission stated there is BY-NC-ND which is not allowed on Wikipedia or Commons as a free image. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here} 02:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep, that's non-free. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Wisdom Redifined.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

reason Definingwisdom (talk) 02:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the logo for the website (http://wisdomresearch.org/). I am one of the webmasters for this site. We want to promote our site as much as possible and we receive a lot of referals from wikipedia. We wanted to include our logo on this page. What do I need to do to keep this image or similar images up on this page?

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Listing the image for deletion is probably not the way to do it. Stifle (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:A science of virtues.jpg

reason Definingwisdom (talk) 02:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the logo for the website (http://scienceofvirtues.org/). I am one of the webmasters for this site. We want to promote our site as much as possible and we receive a lot of referals from wikipedia. We wanted to include our logo on this page. What do I need to do to keep this image or similar images up on this page?

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ultimativer spiderman jumping (looking to left).gif

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Untitled2.PNG

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 06:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Stubbs the zombie himself.jpg

No source and no evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 06:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Phoenix SCCS 1968.jpg

Uploader claims rights to a book cover by virtue of owning a copy of the book; obviously, this is in error. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hauptmann22.jpg

PD-release claimed, but no evidence is given. This is a news photo from the 1930s. There's no info on the copyright holder or date of publication, so we can't know if it's copyrighted or not. I searched online, but found no additional information. (And the claim "Also free for use from government funded taxpayer museum" is spurious). – Quadell ^(talk) 12:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cyclepaths_Vendée.JPG

PUI re-list - Road sign design , France does not have FOP Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Aaronramsey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Conscious (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Web-res pro photo of footballer, no source or author specified – Quadell ^(talk) 14:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Anwarul_Iqbal_ILO_summit.jpg

No source specified, and I don't believe the uploader created this UN image – Quadell ^(talk) 14:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:AtulKochhar.jpg

Obviously a professional photo of a celeb, no source or author info – Quadell ^(talk) 14:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:41 Anniversary.jpg

Delete: This unused image has a copyright notice without any permission from Pakistan People's Party just claim by uploader ww2censor (talk) 16:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Zahidnawaz2.GIF

Delete: This unused image has a copyright notice without any permission from Pakistan People's Party just claim by uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Zahid 2.jpg

Delete: Image is claimed to be freely licenced by uploader but is unused. The image is likely copyright as are other images by the same uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Zahid 1.jpg

Delete: Image is claimed to be freely licenced by uploader but is unused. The image is likely copyright as are other images by the same uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Karsaaz Condolence.gif

Delete: This unused image has a copyright notice without any permission from Pakistan People's Party just claim by uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Qamar Abbas Shaheed First Death Anniversary.gif

Delete: This unused image has a copyright notice without any permission from Pakistan People's Party just claim by uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Thompson-robert.jpg

If "image owned by Arkansas Senate", then I doubt the uploader has the right to release it under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 16:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Imac 2007w-xtra.png

Delete: obviously non-free orphan is a copyrighted professional promotional image found on many sites by tineye. ww2censor (talk) 17:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Contractor.jpg

Claimed released into the public domain, but file is taken from a commercial website http://www.grasshoppermower.com/images/Contractor_Diesel_700.jpg Triwbe (talk) 19:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Rear Discharge .jpg

Probable source is http://www.grasshoppermower.com/images/mid_duramax_4x1.jpg Triwbe (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: Safe for work, despite the title. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Alicehargreaves.jpg

Undated photo, photographer unknown, in the UK copyright lasts 70 years pma – Quadell ^(talk) 20:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep Alice Hargreaves died in 1932 so the photo dates from before then. The photographer is unknown so the image is copyright free under the UK's copyright laws, i.e. the photograph is more than 70 years old. Jack1956 (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep per above, as the photographer is unknown. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment: "pma" means "after the death of the author". If the photographer died in 1939 or before, then the image is PD. If the photographer died afterwards, it's still under copyright. Without knowing who the photographer is, we can't know if it's copyrighted or not. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Read the tag please. If the photographer is unknown, the copyright expires 70 years after creation. I am aware of the problems associated with trying to prove that a photographer is unknown. However, given that the image comes from Jack1956's personal collection (and I see no reason to doubt this claim), I would assume that he is better aware of the provenance of the image and that there can be no way to plausibly determine its creator. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

There are a couple problems with that. First off, Jack1956 says that the image comes from his "personal collection", though it's not clear what that means. As mentioned at File talk:Alicehargreaves.jpg, the image is clearly half-toned, which would indicate publishing in a book or magazine... but there's no credit given. Secondly, "unknown" is problematic, as you point out. The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 says "the identity of an author shall be regarded as unknown if it is not possible for a person to ascertain his identity by reasonable inquiry". If this is a photo in a drawer where no one remember who took it, then that's unknown. But if it was published in a book (as appears likely), and the photographer was credited there, then just because you and I don't happen to know who the author is doesn't make the author "unknown". Thirdly, even if it turns out that the author is "unknown", we still don't know when this photograph was first published. Photographs with "unknown" creators don't go into the public domain in the UK until 2039, if the photos were never published. If they were published, they don't go into the public domain until 70 years after the date of publication. Was this image published before 1939? Neither of us knows, and so neither of us knows if it's PD or not. (See this and this for further info.) – Quadell ^(talk) 18:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

- Hi all, in trying to shed a little light on this, the original image is a not very good quality photograph that has come down through my family to me. The image in the article is a scan that I made of that photograph. My understanding is that the photograph was taken in 1932 at one of the various events staged to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Charles Dodgson. I do not know who took the photograph...it may have been a family member and it may not. Jack1956 (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] July 2

[edit] File:Litti at road side.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

There is no description or source, and it is watermarked with a copyright symbol. Zoo Fari 01:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Flug leuc.jpg

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphaned, possibly in violation of image policy. Zoo Fari 01:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ixor cocc Fr.jpg

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphaned, possibly in violation of image policy. Zoo Fari 01:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Litti at road side stall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Just a crop of File:Litti at road side.jpg to take out the copyright watermark. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:01dagc.jpg

There is no permission in www.serienjunkies.de for using this image under GFDL. O sama K 04:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:01poum.jpg

There is no permission on z.hubpages.com for using this image under GFDL. O sama K 04:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jeremy-wariner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Given this user's upload history, unlikely that this image, high quality, low resolution, and framed, is a free image. Mosmof (talk) 05:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Major Cineplex.JPG

This file, along with File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg and File:City Air Terminal.jpg, was submitted to PUF on 6 March, but was kept due to non-overwhelming evidence of copyright violation, as User:Maxl thought that I seemed to be relying on "a lot of superstition". I was away from editing at that time, however, and had not been able to clarify my position, which is that since all but these three of User:Rootje's uploads have been deleted, mostly due to copyright violations, I believe it wise rather than "superstitious" to cease assuming good faith in such cases. Few users would use a different camera for every shot they upload, and the fact that Rootje has never responded to a talk page inquiry isn't helping his case. Since then, File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg has been confirmed to be a copyright violation and deleted, and I believe the same to be the nature of the other two remaining files. Although this has still yet to be proved beyond all doubt, I believe that given the user's contributions and the inconsistent nature of these uploads, erring on the side of caution would be preferable. Paul_012 ^(talk) 05:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete. I closed the previous discussion as "Keep" for lack of evidence... but looking through the contributor's extensive history of blatant copyright violations, I'd say these are likely copyvios too. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:City Air Terminal.jpg

This file, along with File:Major Cineplex.JPG and File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg, was submitted to PUF on 6 March, but was kept due to non-overwhelming evidence of copyright violation, as User:Maxl thought that I seemed to be relying on "a lot of superstition". I was away from editing at that time, however, and had not been able to clarify my position, which is that since all but these three of User:Rootje's uploads have been deleted, mostly due to copyright violations, I believe it wise rather than "superstitious" to cease assuming good faith in such cases. Few users would use a different camera for every shot they upload, and the fact that Rootje has never responded to a talk page inquiry isn't helping his case. Since then, File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg has been confirmed to be a copyright violation and deleted, and I believe the same to be the nature of the other two remaining files. Although this has still yet to be proved beyond all doubt, I believe that given the user's contributions and the inconsistent nature of these uploads, erring on the side of caution would be preferable. Paul_012 ^(talk) 05:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete, as above. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sarah Michelle G.jpg

File originally upl aded to Wikimedia Commons [18] where it has now been deleted as copyvio Garda40 (talk) 06:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Clc-1 clear.jpg

The file itself is probably justified under fair use, but the picture cannot possibly be GFDL as it probably belongs to the Chinese government. Prefer fixing up the source/copyright/attribution but I have no idea how to do this for PRC images. RabidDeity (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Yоung Shop couple.jpg

Image's source text isn't English, but the only indicated date is 1977, which doesn't support the PD-old tag. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:MichelleWilliams.jpg

Looks like a TV screen capture - makes it a derivative work that is not free Peripitus (Talk) 10:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mtvredcarpet.jpg

Image appears watermarked which indicates it's taken from a website with one of those (c) notices....not a public domain image Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Brshetty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Web resolution, posed. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 10:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Kanpur central.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The in-image credits do not seem consistent with a PD claim. J Milburn (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:1203231390268647 file.jpg

MaenK.A._Talk 15:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Azad indi Brk4.jpg

Watermarked with date prior to upload date, orphan, other images by this user have been deleted. Zoo Fari 16:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cryptolepis buchanani.jpg

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, possibly in violation of image policy Zoo Fari 16:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hemidesmus indica.jpg

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphan, possibly in violation of image policy Zoo Fari 16:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gas2gif.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

take from http://phacedesigns.web.officelive.com/default.aspx Triwbe (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] File:Retief Goosen 2004 U.S. Open.jpg

Uploader claims "own work" with multiple author names, and has changed images uploaded as from another website to "own work" when challenged. This is a low resolution image that looks like a press shot; I doubt the uploader owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mo Kyung--Joong.jpg

Uploader claims "own work" with multiple author names, and has changed images uploaded as from another website to "own work" when challenged. This is a low resolution image that looks like a press shot; I doubt the uploader owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:FSAV.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by IronGargoyle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Contains logos. Orphaned. Dubious encyclopedic use. RabidDeity (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] July 3

[edit] File:Caynabo 2.png

Image is on flickr (here) noting "all rights reserved" and with an upload date pre-dating this one images by four months. Also present on this blog with a date a few days prior to the flickr one. Either the flickr user and the uploader are the same person, or this image is not verifyably free Peripitus (Talk) 02:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Caynaba.JPG

Image is a duplicate of an all-rights-reserved one on flickr. The flickr image pre-dates this one by four months so unless the flickr user and the uploader of this image are the same person, it is not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 02:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Slmbus.jpg

Taken from here and not own work Srikanth (speak) 07:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Bus pudukottai.jpg

taken from here and not own work Srikanth (speak) 07:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Murraykangaroosjumper2.png

Appears to contain a presumably copyrighted logo/insignia. J Milburn (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Image is free. Pattern on the jumper is not a logo, and never was one. I drew the image myself in FireworksNimChief (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Bow wow 04.jpg

Clearly a professional photo, claimed as self-created by someone with a history of copyright violation. TheJazzDalek (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:PeterErbenB&W.jpg

First edition of this upload has "wikipedia use only". Second mentions a permission e-mail. It would be nice if that e-mail could be forwarded to info-da@wikimedia.org (it is probably in Danish?). Nils Emil (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cham_refugees_in_1944.png

1944 pic of Albanian refugees. It says "According to Albanian law, images of state authorities, made during communism are public domain", but this isn't an official state work. {{PD-Albania}} says anonymous works are copyrighted 70 years, but that won't be until 2015, I think. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

It seems to me that if it was taken by a member of the army, it would be an image created by a state authority. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cham_refugees_in_1944.png

1944 pic of Albanian refugees. It says "According to Albanian law, images of state authorities, made during communism are public domain", but this isn't an official state work. {{PD-Albania}} says anonymous works are copyrighted 70 years, but that won't be until 2015, I think. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

See comment above. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:ChristopherYoungDem.jpg

Screen capture without permission MBisanz ^talk 21:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Colleen's_Picture_from_Darrell.jpg

Non-free screen capture MBisanz ^talk 21:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:ExampleReportCard.jpg

Doubt the uploader is the owner of the company that makes the software. MBisanz ^talk 21:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gabbasoft_Rubik's_Revenge.png

Non-free screenshot MBisanz ^talk 22:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Season3concertphoto.jpg

and File:Season3concertphotoit'sallrighthere.jpg from same flickr account.

A flickr download but it is likely a promotional photo, flickr uploader has no meta data on page. Very unlikely to be a genuinely free image. Polly (Parrot) 22:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks like screencaps from a music video that was broadcast by Disney. --NrDg 00:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:41437695.jpg

Delete: Press release style image found by tineye on a number of Indian websites which credits Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy's own website www.ysrportal.com but I cannot find the image there. Several other, possibly non-free images of this uploader, have been deleted previously. ww2censor (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:EB battle.png

Wouldn't the copyright belong to the developer and/or publisher of Rome: Total War rather than the author of the related mod? Rockfang (talk) 22:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gregory ong.gif

This image, though I cannot find its source on the internet, appears to be an official headshot scaled to webresolution and not the property of the uploader to release into the public domain. The edges as well show that the image has been scaled up before uploading here. Peripitus (Talk) 23:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Neri Abalos.jpg

The image claims both that the uploader owns the image and that the author is "anonymous". This image appears to be a professionally produced taken from a press website, I can see press images of the same event that seem taken from the same angle but cannot find this particular image. No exif an web resolution are just additional hints. Peripitus (Talk) 23:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Badawa, 1936 (5).jpg

Submitter claims the image was "self-made", yet the photo was taken in 1936. Call me crazy, but I'm a bit skeptical. RabidDeity (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment - The image has a public domain license and a GNU FDL one as well. I don't think it can be both.--Rockfang (talk) 23:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

This is in the public domain, per {{PD-Iraq}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Are you sure? We don't even know who took the photo, so how do we know that person died 50 years ago? --RabidDeity (talk) 02:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] July 4

[edit] File:6in_2007.jpg

unlikely composite image. MBisanz ^talk 05:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Construction2.gif

Non-free image from Microsoft Office clip art. O sama K 14:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Georgia_Brown_thumbnail.jpg

Looks like a screenshot. O sama K 14:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jamiatur Raza exterior view.jpg

Image size and lack of meta data means it was likely taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Safinaone.jpg

A book cover, uploader is very unlikely to hold the copyright. Small image size is also indicative of being taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Akhtarraza.jpg

Small image size and lack of meta data, image was likely taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Drugstore mini3.jpg

A promotional photo, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 23:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Firrst album.jpg

Album cover artwork, uploader is unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 23:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Morris Minor MM Series.jpg

Image is claimed as PD but I can see it was uploaded to this forum 2 years prior to upload here. The image appears to be a magazine or other printed source scan, not a self-created image. Peripitus (Talk) 23:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] July 5

[edit] Footer

Today is July 5, 2009. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 5 -- (new nomination)

Please remember to add new nominations to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/NewListings.

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:pui log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===July 5===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.

I	Edit the file page. Add {{pui\|log=2009 July 5}} to the file page. If the file is in use, also add {{puic\|File_name.ext\|log=2009 July 5}} to the caption(s).
II	Create its PUI subsection. Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst`:`pui2\|image=File_name.ext\|reason=reason}} ~~~~ (remember to exclude the File: prefix).
III	Give due notice. Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst`:`idw-pui\|Image_name.ext}} Remember to replace "Image_name.ext" with the name of the file