Verdict
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Criminal procedure | ||||||
| Criminal trials and convictions | ||||||
| Rights of the accused | ||||||
| Fair trial · Speedy trial Jury trial · Counsel Presumption of innocence Exclusionary rule1 Self-incrimination Double jeopardy2 |
||||||
| Verdict | ||||||
| Conviction · Acquittal Not proven3 Directed verdict |
||||||
| Sentencing | ||||||
| Mandatory · Suspended Custodial Dangerous offender4, 5 Capital punishment Execution warrant Cruel and unusual punishment |
||||||
| Post-sentencing | ||||||
| Parole · Probation Tariff6 · Life licence6 Miscarriage of justice Exoneration · Pardon |
||||||
| Related areas of law | ||||||
| Criminal defenses Criminal law · Evidence Civil procedure |
||||||
| Portals | ||||||
| Law · Criminal justice | ||||||
|
||||||
In law, a verdict is the formal finding of fact made by a jury on matters or questions submitted to the jury by a judge.[1] The term, from the Latin veredictum, literally means "to say the truth" and is derived from Middle English verdit, from Anglo-Norman: a compound of ver ("true," from the Latin vērus) and dit ("speech," from the Latin dictum, the neuter form of dīcere, to say).[1]
Contents |
[edit] Compromise verdict
[edit] Quotient verdict
[edit] Sealed verdict
[edit] Special verdict
In English law, a special verdict is a verdict by a jury that pronounces on the facts of the case but does not draw the ultimate inference of whether the accused is guilty or not; the judge then applies the law and to convict or acquit.[2][3][4] In the words of William Blackstone, "The jury state the naked facts, as they find them to be proved, and pray the advice of the court thereon".[5]
A famous instance was the case of R v. Dudley and Stephens but generally such verdicts should only be returned in the most exceptional cases.[6][7]
[edit] Jury stress
[edit] See also
| Look up Verdict in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
[edit] References
- ^ a b Black's Law Dictionary, p. 1398 (5th ed. 1979)
- ^ Lord Mackay of Clashfern (ed.) (2006) Halsbury's Laws of England, Vol.11(3) 4th ed. 2006 reissue, "Criminal Law, Evidence and Procedure", 1339. Special verdict.
- ^ Morgan, E. M. (1923) "A brief history of special verdicts", Yale Law Journal, 32:575-592
- ^ Simpson, A. W. B. (1984). Cannibalism and the Common Law: The Story of the Tragic Last Voyage of the Mignonette and the Strange Legal Proceedings to Which It Gave Rise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. pp209–210. ISBN 9780226759425.
- ^ Commentaries on the Laws of England (14th ed.) 3 377
- ^ R v. Bourne (1952) 36 Cr App Rep 125 at 127, CCA, per Lord Goddard CJ
- ^ R v. Agbim [1979] Crim LR 171, CA

