User talk:Sm8900
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
|---|
| hopes you enjoy this picture. is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
| Sm8900 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to my user talk page. Thanks for visiting. --Sm8900 21:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Archives |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
[edit] pers pages
User:sm8900/links
User:sm8900/Archive
User:sm8900/Archive2
User:sm8900/Archive3
User:sm8900/Flashtrek user:sm8900/play by mail list
/Flash games User:sm8900/sonofilter
user:sm8900/Abul Hussam
Botany (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) /categ contents
[edit] discussion pages
Battle of Jenin
Talk:Battle of Jenin
Talk:Palestinian people
Talk:Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Talk:House demolitions in Israeli Palestinian conflict
Talk:Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus
[edit] Intro notes
[edit] hello intro note
[edit] Main itnro note
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
[edit] Articles watchlists; histories
[edit] General pages
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/All
Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Clerks/Noticeboard
Wikipedia:Community_Portal#Departments
Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests
Wikipedia:Village_pump (policy)
Wikipedia:Village_pump (proposals)
Category:AfD debates (Games or sports)
current article for del discussions
[edit] Project pages
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject United States
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Israel
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Judaism
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Jewish history
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Star Trek
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Star Wars
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Community
artilces to watch history and talk pages: Battle of Jenin
Talk:Battle of Jenin
Talk:Palestinian people
Talk:Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Talk:House demolitions in Israeli Palestinian conflict
Talk:Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus
Israeli-Palestinian conflict
House demolitions in Israeli Palestinian conflict
Sm8900 Sm8900 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3)
Artilces worked on:
U.S. Army Service Uniform
Robert Smalls
Interesting articles: SH-60 main us navy helicopter
World War II
[edit] main topics category
current items in category (70 items):
A [+] Agriculture [+] Ancient history [+] Applied sciences [+] Archaeology [+] Architecture [+] Arts [+] Astronomy [+] Atoms B [+] Biology [+] Business C [+] Chemistry [+] Computing [+] Crafts [+] Culture D [+] Drama E [+] Earth [+] Earth sciences [+] Education [+] Energy [+] Environment [+] Events F [+] Film G [+] Geography [+] Geology H [+] Health [+] Historical eras [+] History [+] History by continent I [+] Industry J [+] Justice K [+] Knowledge L [+] Language [+] Law [+] Literature M [+] Manufacturing [+] Materials [+] Mathematics [+] Matter [+] Medicine [+] Mental health [+] Microorganisms [+] Military [+] Music N [+] Nature P [+] People P cont. [+] Performing arts [+] Philosophy [+] Physics [+] Politics [+] Psychology [+] Publishing R [+] Radio [+] Religion [+] Research S [+] Science [+] Society [+] Sociology T [+] Technical [+] Technology [+] Telephony [+] Television [+] Theatre [+] Thought [+] Tools U [+] Universe V [+] Virtues [+] Visual arts
[edit] articles worked on
Category:Diplomatic conferences,
Category:Political charters,
Category:United States national commissions.
Sono filter Category:Akiba Hebrew Academy alumni
Sono,
Advanced Destroyer Simulator,
Aegis: Guardian of the Fleet, user:sm8900/glw
User:sm8900/mike
Hohoho
User:sm8900/idea
Major ww2 revisions: 3/20/07, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_War_II&oldid=115799022 User:sm8900/photo idea
15:13, 17 March 2007 Jack Naven Rulez (Talk | contribs) (→Cause of war in Europe) (cur) (last) 14:28, 17 March 2007 Oberiko (Talk | contribs) m (→Cause of war in Europe - - There was no Soviet Union during World War I) (cur) (last) 13:40, 17 March 2007 Haber (Talk | contribs) (→Causes - major removals and more stating of elementary facts)
|
}}} | style="text-align: center"|
[edit] need help
Why does it seem impossible to find any wikiprojects through regular searches???? How would I find these? I tried and tried everything I could think of. thanks very much. --Sm8900 17:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Try Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory and Category:WikiProjects. —PurpleRAIN 17:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. I found this by typing "WikiProject" into the search box and then following a couple of links. If that didn't work for you, it may be that your default search preferences aren't searching in the Wikipedia: namespace. You can check this by clicking my preferences at the top right of any Wikipedia page, then clicking the Search tab. You can also set namespace preferences on a per-search basis by checking the appropriate namespaces at the bottom of the Wikipedia search page. —PurpleRAIN 17:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] finding things
{{help me}} I am having a lotof trouble finding things. First of all, how does one access the advanced search page? Whenever I do a search, i get a whole bunch of checkboxes with the search results. Is there a way to access these checkboxes easilyin general?
Also, why can't I find the page on "user boxes"? I know there is one, but I was totally unable to find it, either by searching or using the index. hope this can be clarified. thanks.
1. Under My Preferences, click on the "search" box, and you can specify which search boxes will be clicked by default when you do a search.
2. You may find Category:Wikipedia userboxes to be helpful.
In the future, feel free to ask questions at the Help desk, as responses may be quicker. Patstuarttalk|edits 20:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Userboxes
| This user is a member of WikiProject United States. |
| This user is a member of the History WikiProject. |
| This user is a member of WikiProject Judaism. |
| This user participates in WikiProject Israel. |
| This user is a member of WikiProject Star Trek. |
| This user is a member of the Video Games WikiProject. Sign up for the VG Newsletter. |
| This user is a member of the The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Wikiproject. |
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome to Wikipedia. Well, you seem to have been here a while, but I haven't welcomed you yet. Regarding contentious articles, as you say, just follow my contributions and you'll find them soon enough. :-) Jayjg (talk) 20:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Special Barnstar
| The Special Barnstar | ||
| For setting an example of what consensus building, neutrality, and fairness might look like and helping defend the edits of those who don't necessarily share your POV Tiamat 13:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you. Tiamat 13:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Tiamat! I really appreciate your kind and encouraging gesture. it means a lot to be appreciated. thanks. See you. --Steve, Sm8900 13:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your CfD nomination - a suggestion
Hi there - as you yourself created the category that you've nominated for deletion, you can just add {{db-author}} to the category and an admin will happily delete it for you. No need for the drama of a CfD nomination if you've made a mistake (we've all been there...) Regards, BencherliteTalk 21:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your note
Thanks for the thoughtful note. I'm doing much better now (I haven't taken antibiotics in years, so when they went to work pretty fast). The house is also coming along slowly but surely. We'll probably move in with it half finished before the end of the month to avoid paying another month's rent. The rest will take some time anyway. I want to try to get artisanal tiles and do some mosaics on the floors and walls. It will be a lifetime work in progress. Great fun. Hope you're doing well too. Tiamut 20:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] William Cooley and whites
You know, this has been discussed; it was European in the beginning, and several editors changed it back to whites. Not sure which ones is the more correct.--Legionarius (talk) 18:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. thanks for your comment. i feel that "american" is definitely better. for one thing, the Spanish had definitely settled that area decades before, as described in East Florida, Spanish missions in Florida, etc. So the real significance is that he was the first American settler, clearly he was not the first white. besides, there is no need to indicate who the first settler was in an individual biography; the only reason it is here is to indicate his notability or claim to fame, which works just as well with the word "American," (and which is probably more accurate anyway).--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you (it was my first choice anyway). Let's see if it sticks. Although I am not so sure there were Spaniards in Broward specifically, so maybe that's the "whites" point.--Legionarius (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- thanks! good to hear from you. I';m logging off soon. but feel free to stay in touch. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 19:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you (it was my first choice anyway). Let's see if it sticks. Although I am not so sure there were Spaniards in Broward specifically, so maybe that's the "whites" point.--Legionarius (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the kind note
I appreciate your comments too Steve. I'm sorry about not voting for the people compromise. I'm just attached to the reliable sources regarding nation. I will try to think about it some more. Of course I appreciate your efforts in trying to achieve consensus. Hope you are doing well. Tiamut 17:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- you, too. you're welcome! thanks for writing. see you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Newsletters, etc
[edit] WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.
-
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 03:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Introducing WikiProject United States Government...
Hello Sm8900,
Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.
Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.
Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.
|
Help us get the project off the ground and flying.
[edit] CHOGM items
Thanks. I have no big concerns with the redirects being placed in that category. Obviously, when they cease being redirects, they unambiguously belong there anyway (except perhaps 1949, which wasn't a CHOGM per se, but that's an issue to decide later). There are a few that you missed that I'm now filling in with more redirects. Bastin 16:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- sounds great! thanks. feel free to write anytime. the more we can document past events, even minor ones, of historical import, the better. that's what Wikipedia is for. and it's one of several areas where eventually, we may eventually outpace more established encyclopedias, since very few of them have the manpower or resources to documents events of minor historical significance as systematically as we can! thanks! keep it up. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, CHOPM page, which covers the 1949 meeting redirects to the CHOGM page. so that's why these things interrelated, just to answer your brief question. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] To show my appreciation
| The Barnstar of Peace | ||
| For cogent and sincere efforts to cool down the perpetual Israeli-Palestinian flamewar. I hope the UN logo doesn't put you off ;-) <eleland/talkedits> 01:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hi Eleland. Wow, thanks so much! this barnstar looks really nice btw. no prob on the UN logo! I've always thought it looks nice. It's really nice to be aprpeciated. i was starting to wonder whether anyone was going to notice that I was trying to be fair to both sides. I was a little surprised to get some flak initially, but I guess that's just the nature of this topic. anyway, it 's really great to hear that my efforts are not going unnoticed. thanks so much. see you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Steve, along the same lines, here's something you've helped inspire. After all, you've started both the medcab idea and mentioned the old Oasis. I've even mentioned you in this (hopefully not in vain), so you might want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration, which is inspired by some of the ArbCom discussion of the Sri Lanka effort. Thanks. HG | Talk 13:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- LOL, your not joining is so funny, you're practically a member emeritus! Don't be self-effacing, cuz if you don't sign up, who the heck would?! Don't forget, I'm not committing to work on this either, if it doesn't become a going concern.... Anyway, thanks for helping out already! HG | Talk 17:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Ok, that sounds good. guess i can join. thanks for being so willing to give me a role. didn't realize i had talked my self into a role in this! :-) didn't know i was already an emeritus...do i get a gold watch? :-) actually, guess my concern was a slo that i can't guarantee that my edits will also be so constructive, but i guess that's the idea; this is for all those who might enter controversial areas, but are at least willing to discuss this sometimes. so this all might all be interesting. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, I see that you not only joined, you're already contributing with your indomitable good cheer. Sure, I'll lounge with you, though I hope you'll still check out the issues being discussed on the wikiproject Talk page. (Is the idea that the lounge is more free flowing that the Talk page? So far, we have so few folks involved that we might not need to split up the conversation, but I admire you for planning for a busier day ahead.) Thanks! HG | Talk 03:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, that sounds good. guess i can join. thanks for being so willing to give me a role. didn't realize i had talked my self into a role in this! :-) didn't know i was already an emeritus...do i get a gold watch? :-) actually, guess my concern was a slo that i can't guarantee that my edits will also be so constructive, but i guess that's the idea; this is for all those who might enter controversial areas, but are at least willing to discuss this sometimes. so this all might all be interesting. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thanks. truthfully, I don't actually have any comments which i wish to make now. I just felt that people were often having useful conversations in many scattered places. i wanted to provide an open-ended place, where absolutely any conversation occur, so that we no longer have to scavenege for snippets of real conversations in obscure edit controversies. So over time, this might be a useful place to have ( or even to gather from other pages) the conversations which might have occurred in remote places before. I look forward to futher ideas. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RE: ArbCom Ideas
Steve, First, Congratulations on the Barnstar, you deserve it!
I appreciate your suggestion to move it to my own section, I had considered it, but both frankly and in jest, I cant. There are now no more templates and it would take me too long to figure how to format it properly. It is approaching bedtime on my side of the world, have been out on the town, so to speak, and am currently operating with one eye closed to see the screen better. It is too late to change now since the rest of the will have woken up, seen it and maybe commented. I am also somewhat handicapped in that I am computer-phobic and only a six-fingered, one-thumbed typist at the best of times. Seriously, tho, I decided to put it in the 'working group' because it is, well, not by any means normal and figured it needed more thought, which the proposed working group could well provide. If the balloon pops, I wont have wasted too much time. But I was thunk out when I posted it and went out the door. When I first got home, I was on Nishidani's page and noted this [1], which I hadn't chased before. I was quite suprised, because it was just hours after I had posted the article-on-a-fork proposal. Anyway, I'll leave it where it is, lets just say it was bad timing. Regards, CasualObserver'48 (talk) 15:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem! By the way, establishing your own section only requires cut-and-paste; there are no templates involved. however feel free to implement this at your own pace. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sfc1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sfc1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Here's a concept for all of you
what the hell does this have to do with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. if this is just a suggestion about an ethnological concept? why the hell is it being raised here? just make the edits at the article. don't discuss the Jewish people. oh, and here's a suggestion for the rest of you; don;'t discuss the Jewish people. If you do want to discuss the Jewish people, here's what you should do: don't discuss the Jewish people. Thank you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Durova, you need to understand, we're not against using many sources. however, there needs to be some way to adddress the biased, hateful soruces used by the pro-Israeli side. This is in contrast to the many beacons of truth and impartiality on the pro-Palestinian side, like Yassser Arafat. israeli sources do need to be held to some sort of standard. Please don't get hung up on these details. remember that the creation of Israel was based on the theft of Paletinian land. We need to proscribe sources who claim there can be any reconciliation with the colonialist Zionists. We need oto show clearly that the Zionists have no right to accuse us of being against peace; and also, that we are fully justified in opposing them through war. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- That sounds like what I wrote sometimes when I am extremely angry.
- And that is quite often here.
- You are convinced I am pro-Palestinian biased, aren't you ? And many others are convinced I am pro-Israeli biased, don't they ?
- I am not neutral.
- It is not acceptable that the legitimity of Israel is discussed or debated. And the events of '48, whatever they were do not put this into question. It took 100 years of work to build the Israel's state of today. Zionism is now the past; present and future are Israel's State and citizens. Let's hope Palestinians will find a solution for what they lived and live too.
- This being said, in most articles, we just give all pov's and give controversies on topic if any. No more, no less. Truth is not our concern. Our concern is NPoV. Ceedjee (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, my comment to Durova above is extremely sarcastic. However, I do aprpeciate your extremely thoughtful and helpful comment. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I had understood it was extremely sarcastic. I am used to be sarcastic too :-)
- Take care, because some people do not appreciate this.
- And I remember some useful comments you have with me in the past. So I think you deserve que "je renvoie l'ascenceur" (I send the lift back) as we say in French. Rgds, Ceedjee (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, my comment to Durova above is extremely sarcastic. However, I do aprpeciate your extremely thoughtful and helpful comment. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Durova, you need to understand, we're not against using many sources. however, there needs to be some way to adddress the biased, hateful soruces used by the pro-Israeli side. This is in contrast to the many beacons of truth and impartiality on the pro-Palestinian side, like Yassser Arafat. israeli sources do need to be held to some sort of standard. Please don't get hung up on these details. remember that the creation of Israel was based on the theft of Paletinian land. We need to proscribe sources who claim there can be any reconciliation with the colonialist Zionists. We need oto show clearly that the Zionists have no right to accuse us of being against peace; and also, that we are fully justified in opposing them through war. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Star Trek (film)
Remember, per WP:TALK discussion pages are for improving articles. Your query appeared to be general discussion: indeed, that these characters are uncast may be self-explanatory. Alientraveller (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose you may be right. hopefully, those characters will show up though. thanks for your reply. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You need archiving help
I can help. Or you can see here. Easiest way is to paste in the following at the top of your page: {{User:MiszaBot/config |maxarchivesize = 250K |counter = 1 |algo = old(90d) |archive = User talk:Sm8900/Archive %(counter)d }} {{archive box|auto=yes}}
You may have to put a carriage return before each of the '|' characters. You should remove the existing archive box or leave that last part out. You can adjust the number of days by changing the figure before the 'd'. It will not archive immediately, wait 24 hours and see if it happens. Hope this helps, and best regards.--Gregalton (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- that sounds good. i'll take a look at that later. not sure if I want to do that yet, but I appreciate it. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- My rule of thumb is once you get over a hundred sub-topics...)) --Gregalton (talk) 15:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- makes sense. I appreciate the idea. thanks for the input. see you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- My rule of thumb is once you get over a hundred sub-topics...)) --Gregalton (talk) 15:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Using Template:Cfd-notify
Hi there! I just discovered that you ran into a slight problem with Template:Cfd-notify a while back, due to not "substituting" the template -- which causes the newly created section to link to Template:Cfd-notify! (yikes) Anyhow, I've clarified the instructions for using the template, so hopefully future users won't run into that problem -- you weren't the first! :) Regards, Cgingold (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] re:Doctor Who Wiki
Dr. Who Wiki was tagged for speedy deletion since it doesn't explain why the Wiki is notable. Articles can be created for Wikis other than Wikipedia, but they must meet the same criteria that any other article on a website must meet (WP:WEB).
[edit] page status
No problem. Good luck with the discussion to get the edit warring resolved. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] wikipedia has a neutrality policy
hey i shouldnt have to tell you this as you have a .jpg that says experienced editor.. but wikipedia has a neutrality policy
you completely butchered any semblance of neutrality in the Keith L. Y. Wright article
"Mr. Wright brings to the Assembly an extensive record of community service and a commitment to providing the residents of the 70th Assembly District with an unwavering, effective voice in the state legislature."
unwavering effective voice for instance?
come on man.. do you work on the campaign or something? im not from there.. i dont prefer either party.. but i certainly dont like seeing sycophantic worshipful wiki articles for either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.13.127 (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. I appreciate the feedback. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 01:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] HMS Serpents and others
There have been about 15,000 commissioned ships of the Royal Navy over its (roughly) 500 year history, and at last count there are about half a dozen editors working on and off (me included) to write their articles. Major warships, especially the recent ones have some form of article, but the further back you go the scantier the coverage is. That could be why I think. Benea (talk) 01:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok...makes sense. with you and your efforts, it shouldn't be long before we have a whole lot more of them! :-) excellent work; I was looking at some your articles. thanks for your work and your reply. hope to speak again. thanks. see you,. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 01:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Meanwhile, if you have specific queries on individual RN vessels, please contact me at sailing.navy@btinternet.com and I'll try and help, particularly on early vessels. Rif Winfield (talk) 13:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your note
Hey Steve. I appreciate your note. I personally find all killing to be really sad. I do understand how desperation, anger, frustration can drive people to do terrible things, but taking life is to me, under all circumstances, just terrible - I mean it's so precious, such a gift and I mourn the loss of every life. Even American soldiers in Iraq (12 of whom were killed in the last three days), who are technically fair game being occupiers and all, when they are killed by the resistance, I don't feel any joy or satisfaction. It's all just such a waste. Their lives, millions of Iraqi lives, tens of thousands of Palestinian lives, thousands of Israeli lives, why do all these people have to die? Why can't reason prevail? Why can't occupations end and there be peace with justice and respect for all? I just don't get it. Anyway, I hope you are doing okay. And I hope you can understand where I am coming from and that my words are not intended to excuse anything or offend anyone. My sympathies lie with all people really. I view all of humanity as my family. It's the systems that are killing us all that are my only enemy - and not the people who make the mistake of propping them up. I try to remember that every person is a potential ally against the systems that bind us all in a neverending cycle of domination and resistance. Anyway, thanks again for checking in. Tiamuttalk 00:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. i appreciate your reply. As you seem to have guessed, i don't entirely share your opinion on the US in iraq, but I agree with you that there are legitimate grievances on both sides. i share many of your sentiments. thanks for writing. see you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Favor Regarding Second Intifada Article
Hi, Sm8900. Sorry to ask this of you, but... A number of editors of the Second Intifada article are attempting to push the Palestinian POV by asserting that the Second Intifada was an "uprising" not only by name but also by nature. The discussion has been going here, here, and here. I appear to be the last hold-out against making this POV edit, and I could really use some help. Thanks. ← Michael Safyan (talk) 03:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hi I understand. I aprpeciate your efforts. i think you're totally right. however, if the odds are that lopsided, there are probably only two options; either try to revise the phrase to say "what some consider an upriosing," or simply allow the edit to go through, and that way more Israel-affiliated editors will see it, and call for a change. sorry i can't be more helpful, but I find protracted discussions on terminology can be extremely hard to alter. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand. Thanks for the advice. ← Michael Safyan (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, can you respond to this RfC for me, please? Thanks. ← Michael Safyan (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand. Thanks for the advice. ← Michael Safyan (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] tools
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~tim/cgi-bin/contribution-counter
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate
[edit] Username
True, but considering the Earth has been destroyed to make way for a hyperspace bypass there's not much point worrying about causing any offense there... Vl'hurg talk 22:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well-said fellow spacer! however, since you routinley plumb the full-spanned breadth of infitnity in all multi-dimensional infinitude, you can always find other Earth, presumably, the General Mish-Mash. Perhaps we will open a new Wikipedia entry on that! --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Japan Steel Works
--BorgQueen (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-18 Second Intifada
Just notifying you, that as you have been involved in the discussion regarding the Second Intifada article, which is now the subject of a MedCab case, I'm notifying you of this as you may wish to partake in this case to discuss a resolution to this dispute. Feel free to leave a comment on my talk page. Regards, Steve Crossin (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SFC 1/2 differences
This is gonna sound lame, but I've only just figured out how to use this talk function. If you still want some information on the games, feel free to gimme a holler and I'll be happy to help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbo9000 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I didn't know
But thanks for letting me know. :) Good work to you too. Happy editing! Tiamuttalk 16:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- :-) you're welcome. glad to. thanks for writing. see you! --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Bobet 16:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] new mmiogs
new mmogs: Dark Orbit, infantry, subspace. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for acknowledging
Thanks for acknowledging my new article. I'm a perfectionist and if I'll wait to write perfect articles then I'll never get anywhere. Therefore I hope to start similar skeleton articles and later fill in the details if someone else hadn't done it by then. I'll be away for Yom Tov, so Ah Kosheren Pesach. Itzse (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Same to you. hope you have a great Yom Tov. thanks for writing. i agree with the approach which you stated, namely to go ahead with the ideas, and to start the process going. thanks for writing. see you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you for voting Keep in my MfD poll. With your help, the debate ended with "no consensus" (although a large majority voted to "keep"). --GHcool (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] fyi
I put up the following link at the wikilobby page which speaks to your point re secrecy: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wikiforpalestine/?v=1&t=search&ch=web&pub=groups&sec=group&slk=1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dajudem (talk • contribs) 17:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dear User: IMPORTANT WIKI ARCADE GAMES PROJECT NOTICE
As you should be aware the wiki arcade games project has been marked inactive and with good reason. I am trying to increase the activity of this project but first I need to know who is still actually interested. So to find out I have put inactive next to the name of every person who has put them selves down as a participant of the project. If for whatever reason you do not intend to participate in the project anymore please remove your name from the participant list altogether. If you do but not in the near future leaving inactive next to your username will be helpful. Not taking any action at all will of course lead to inactive remaining against your name on the participant list. If however you have every intention on continuing in participating in the project please come change the "inactive" next to your username to "ACTIVE" so that it is clear who does and who does not still have interest in participating in the project. Thankyou for your time. --Hybrid360 (talk) 20:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wallenberg article material
In December 1993, investigator Marvin Makinen of the University of Chicago performed interviews with an eyewitness who asserted that she had seen Wallenberg in the 1960s in a Soviet prison. Makinen used prison records to find additional evidence which could corroborate this. [1] --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 23:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 22:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Can you drop me an e-mail?
Hi Steve, can you drop me an e-mail please? If you could that would be great. The address is the letter a followed by my username (no dots or spaces) at gmail.com
Thank Oboler (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. actually, I think it's better if you email me, if you wish. generally the person who wants the email exchange is usually the one who initiates it. the reason is that people here do not always wish to disclose their email address. so this gives them the option of replying via email, or by other means. basically, the reason is that whoever sends an email instantly reveals their address, but the one receiving doesn't then have to reveal it unless they wish to. thanks very much. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 01:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Fire departments in the United States
How come you have categorized a dozen articles under this category when they are not in fact fire departments? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's a valid question. the reason I did that is that they are national fire agencies, coordinating agencies, or other important agencies. this should all be grouped. we have no category for Category: Firefighting in the United States, or Category:United States firefighting agencies, or I would have placed them there. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is nothing preventing one of those proposed categories from being created. I think they would be better grouped under those cats. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe you're right. i will try to think about this, and to go over some various options first. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is nothing preventing one of those proposed categories from being created. I think they would be better grouped under those cats. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] High-Level Conference on World Food Security
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of High-Level Conference on World Food Security, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fao.org/foodclimate/conference/en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fact or opinion?
I see. so you feel that your categorical opposition to all military acts of certain Western cultures is not a political opinion, but is a factual position? Sorry, but i feel that any viewpoint like this falls somewhat within the realm of political opinion. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, I was stating a little recognised fact (apparently commented on by another, though I'm not sure where now) that impacts hugely on our editing. We live in a heavily militarised culture, and even in the UK, this is a big change from the days of the British Empire 100 years ago. This, the work of one of the (the?) foremost poet/authors of the British Empire is how it used to be. If you need a handle on my personal opinions (why?), I have no pacifist inclinations. PRtalk 10:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Ok. thanks for your reply. sounds reasonable. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] articles
helicopter rescue basket, U.S. Climate Change Science Program, Valley of Peace initiative
[edit] News letters
[edit] articles to do
atiomcreations, chosen space, etc etc. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ten Lost Tribes
Hi - I thought Allen's stuff was just a website, but I see where I went wrong there. Yair Davidiy is obviously a suitable source for Brit-Am, no problem there. But I don't see how Capt can qualify as a reliable source for this. I'm sure you know his ideas about the pyramids, for instance. And his claim " Phonetically "Khumri", "Omri", and "Gimiri" are similar." is not only put as though it is fact, he is not qualified to make that statement, as it requires knowing not how we pronounce the words, but how they were originally pronounces. If this is a significant view that needs to be represented, surely there must be a more reliable source, and if it is just Capt, it doesn't appear to be a significant view. Doug Weller (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I really appreciate your reply, and your open approach to this. thanks so much. No problem, re the first item you mentioned. thanks. what you say is helpful. re Capt, i will have to try to take another look at this, and try to give it some thought. i hope it's ok if i get back to you a little later? thanks so much. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] new category.
Your new category is essentially a duplicate of the category Golden Age superheroes. Please consider reverting and MfD'ing the category. Thank you. ThuranX (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- If that is your goal, then you may want to rename the category. Saying, "superheroes published before 1950" lumps all superheroes together, regardless of whether or not they are in publication. Maybe, "comic characters in publication since 1950" or something to that effect. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, good point. i'm cuyrrently changing the category name. what do you think of this: "...in publication since 1940s"? let me know. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- That's more accurate of what you were explaining on ThuranX's page. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Appreciate it. feel free to write anytime. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's more accurate of what you were explaining on ThuranX's page. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- (ECx4!!!)It's a bit better, but do you distinguish between continuous publication, or repeated? The difference being Detective Comics or Aquaman. And what about Captain America? He had his own book, then got mixed into other books, then back out into his own book, with a brief publication stop at the end of the 1950's, before being brought back in The Avengers. Does it count if a character is in publication in multiple books, and you have to jump back and forth to make it count as continuous, like characters appearing sometimes in Action Comics and sometimes in Adventure Comics? How big an intentional publication hiatus will you permit? ThuranX (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Hi. good comment. i would suggest that really I meant: those now in publication, starting in 1940s. However, that would've been a bit long. So I appreciate your excellent point. i would suggest that any hiatus is not of major significance, if the comics character has some degree of cultural prominence; since what people will notice most of all is that a given character has been around quite a long time, and is very familiar to the average person. so that was the main thing which i was trying to capture here; those superheroes of lasting cultural significance, or achieving iconic status.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- By the way, that's one main reason for creating this category; social researchers might be interested in superheroes who have an iconic pop status, or literary significance. they might not be able to wade through the dozens of superhero characters in the more generalized categories. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- But establishing a list of "iconic pop status, or literary significance" would be OR or SYNTH, because it'd be your personal baseline of what counts and doesn't. And for things in publication, you'd be noting the comic, not the character, so the category would apply to Batman, Detective, Action... and that's about it, I'd think. ThuranX (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, but I'm not establishing based on pop status, only those which began in the 1940s and which are now in print. As you note, better to go with clear objective criteria. re what's in publication, my point is the category itself specifies characters in publication. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- But establishing a list of "iconic pop status, or literary significance" would be OR or SYNTH, because it'd be your personal baseline of what counts and doesn't. And for things in publication, you'd be noting the comic, not the character, so the category would apply to Batman, Detective, Action... and that's about it, I'd think. ThuranX (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates
Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Inclusion or Exclusion at Battle of Jenin?
Hi Steve - I remember your early contributions and your preference for including most everything. I warned you then that there are some really atrocious sources out there, and it would be dangerous to give credibility to everything. You now seem to have swung to the opposite point of view, saying "I disagree with all of this, as massive WP:SOAP and WP:OR". I'm pretty sure that what I've assembled is very good information from highly respected sources. Your comment reads exactly like an IDONTLIKEIT. Wouldn't it be better to couch your objections in WP:POLICY terms?
Here are the other factual references I'd like to put forwards for mediation:
- Sharon was widely reported to have told the world's media on 5th March that "Palestinians must be hit ... must cause them losses, victims a month before the incursions (and before the surge of suicide bombings that is already mentioned in the article). Sharon's statement was criticised by Colin Powell and Time Magazine linked it directly to the military action that followed with "He went on to do just that, unleashing a broader military offensive than anything seen so far in the past 17 months of fighting."
- Sharons advisor told the UN special envoy, Terje Roed-Larsen that he "has no business whatsoever to tell us what is right or wrong".
- The BBC reported that Israel was putting three refrigerated trailers into the camp, and everyone agrees they were there. An Israeli newspaper told us that Israel would bury up to 200 bodies in a "special cemetery in the Jordan valley" (ie a closed military zone) - only an application to the Israeli Supreme Court stopped it.
- Clips from the interview given by the bulldozer driver to an Israeli newspaper - he boasts of not caring for the civilian deaths he believe he caused.
- Account of the third "international observer/human rights" group that made a visit and presented a "Jenin Investigation", still finding complete bodies 3 months later. (Needless to say, we should not practice OR on what effect this might have on the death toll).
- A single (small but) actual "up-against-the-wall-massacre" reported in careful detail, with the two perpetrators identified, Amnesty and the Independent newspaper.
- Allegations included in the UN report that the Israelis mined the refugee camp before they left.
- Mention that this particular action in Jenin refugee camp was only part of a series of armed incursions. Israel was still applying curfews and killing people in and and out of curfew for months afterwards. (The UN notes two further incursions). Ian Hook, chief of the reconstruction project, was shot dead, inside the UN compound, on 22nd Nov 2002 and an Irish woman was shot and badly injured in the thigh at almost exactly the same time.
- A new section on the overpowering smell in the camp once it was re-opened, as reported by almost every one of the international observers - eg the New York Times: The smell of decomposing bodies hung over at least six heaps of rubble today, and weeks of excavation may be needed before an accurate death toll can be made.
- Mention of the claim that Israeli actions had, as claimed by the UN "... had the effect of severely weakening the [Palestinian] Authority's capacity to take effective action against militant groups that launched attacks on Israelis". PRtalk 15:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
-
- Hi. i replied to you, at article talk page. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I am extremely tempted to move your contributions there somewhere else, since you appear to be attempting to deal with the "truth" of a few of the points I'm offering for mediation, rather than, as the section was opened to do, propose what you want included in the mediation (or object to some of my points ever being included in mediation on really extreme, time-wasting, grounds). In their current form, your contributions look a bit like more of the same as you started with, an IDONTLIKEIT campaign.
- However, if you wished us to jump the gun and plunge straight into real objections to any of the 10 points above on V, OR, BLP, EXTREME or UNDUE grounds, we could have the discussion here or some other place to your satisfaction. PRtalk 16:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I appreciate your reply. At this point, that's pretty much all i want to say in the discussion. thanks for your points though. I guess I do prefer to discuss all this at the article talk page. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- PS - you seem to have ignored my attempt to discuss point #10 above. I don't mind having several discussions going on at once, but you seem to have ignored one fact-based rebuttal of your objections in order to "open" a further 9 simultaneously. I feel as if I'm being ushered to a distinctly non-structured discussion, a gaping maw of chaos. PRtalk 17:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia discussions do not require a reply to every editor's points; discussions are always open to the community at large; so an editor can leave some things for others to comment on, as that editor may see fit. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm becoming increasingly concerned at what's going on here eg: saying that The BBC reported that Israel was putting three refrigerated trailers into the camp, and everyone agrees they were there. An Israeli newspaper told us that Israel would bury up to 200 bodies in a "special cemetery in the Jordan valley" (ie a closed military zone) - only an application to the Israeli Supreme Court stopped this referenced here and here is "just insinuation and hearsay. etc etc". If I didn't know you better, I would think you had completely abandoned policy on reliable sources. PRtalk 18:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Everything you just referred to are not actual events, or even anything historically significant. quite simply, they do not refer to anything which occurred in relation to this event. therefore including them has obvious political motives. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- You're on your own then, because some of those incidents have been confirmed as genuine by editors much closer to your position than mine. Nor have they forgotten what people say: "Auschwitz teaches us that we cannot remain indifferent, that we cannot look the other way when atrocities take place, that we must always be ready to speak out against evil no matter where it takes place and no matter who the victims are." - Miles Lerman, Chairperson, United States Holocaust Memorial Council (1995) PRtalk 21:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your constructive approach to this debate between us (seriously). However, refriegerated trailers do not = massacre. A smell does not =a massacre. Even lots of violence does not =massacre. Only a cold-blooded premediated killing of civilians, lined up in open view, with not threatening aspect to anyone =massacre.--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- You're on your own then, because some of those incidents have been confirmed as genuine by editors much closer to your position than mine. Nor have they forgotten what people say: "Auschwitz teaches us that we cannot remain indifferent, that we cannot look the other way when atrocities take place, that we must always be ready to speak out against evil no matter where it takes place and no matter who the victims are." - Miles Lerman, Chairperson, United States Holocaust Memorial Council (1995) PRtalk 21:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Everything you just referred to are not actual events, or even anything historically significant. quite simply, they do not refer to anything which occurred in relation to this event. therefore including them has obvious political motives. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm becoming increasingly concerned at what's going on here eg: saying that The BBC reported that Israel was putting three refrigerated trailers into the camp, and everyone agrees they were there. An Israeli newspaper told us that Israel would bury up to 200 bodies in a "special cemetery in the Jordan valley" (ie a closed military zone) - only an application to the Israeli Supreme Court stopped this referenced here and here is "just insinuation and hearsay. etc etc". If I didn't know you better, I would think you had completely abandoned policy on reliable sources. PRtalk 18:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia discussions do not require a reply to every editor's points; discussions are always open to the community at large; so an editor can leave some things for others to comment on, as that editor may see fit. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- PS - you seem to have ignored my attempt to discuss point #10 above. I don't mind having several discussions going on at once, but you seem to have ignored one fact-based rebuttal of your objections in order to "open" a further 9 simultaneously. I feel as if I'm being ushered to a distinctly non-structured discussion, a gaping maw of chaos. PRtalk 17:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I appreciate your reply. At this point, that's pretty much all i want to say in the discussion. thanks for your points though. I guess I do prefer to discuss all this at the article talk page. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. i replied to you, at article talk page. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Peter Deilmann Cruises
A tag has been placed on Peter Deilmann Cruises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ten Lost Tribes
Thanks for letting me know. I'm pressed for time, but I'll try to look at it after the weekend. Jayjg (talk) 23:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:DC Comics superheroes in publication since 1940s
Category:DC Comics superheroes in publication since 1940s, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.
[edit] Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hello to you too
Thanks for the quick note, noting my return. Hope you are doing well. Tiamuttalk 13:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- You, too! thanks for writing back. see you! --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Currently-published superheroes created in 1930-1950
I have nominated Category:Currently-published superheroes created in 1930-1950 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Hiding T 15:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Evochron1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Evochron1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Titanic alternative theories
May I enquire as to why you restored the text? After an AfD favouring merger and a discussion where no objections were raised, I went ahead and merged. It would seem proper, then, that you take similar steps when restoring the text, either on my talk page or (preferably) on the article talk page. Thank you. Biruitorul Talk 20:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for your note. could you please tell me where you proceeded with the merge? it looked like the text was all simply deleted all the text there, and was not transferred to anywhere else. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it wasn't a full merge, as much of the text is (in my view at least) unencyclopedic. What I did was condense it into a small paragraph encapsulating the salient points (and compliant with WP:V and WP:FRINGE); the redirect preserved the article history, as required by the GFDL. Biruitorul Talk 15:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's been a tiny dispute on this article recently. I would support a redirect, as it is difficult to find anything reliable. Cenarium Talk 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I would suggest that we file a formal request for merge, before taking any such steps. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's no such thing as a request for merge. Merges are discussed on the talk page, or forced through AFD. It's possible to announce the discussion with template:merge though. Cenarium Talk 14:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. perhaps a WP:AFD then. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's no such thing as a request for merge. Merges are discussed on the talk page, or forced through AFD. It's possible to announce the discussion with template:merge though. Cenarium Talk 14:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I would suggest that we file a formal request for merge, before taking any such steps. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's been a tiny dispute on this article recently. I would support a redirect, as it is difficult to find anything reliable. Cenarium Talk 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it wasn't a full merge, as much of the text is (in my view at least) unencyclopedic. What I did was condense it into a small paragraph encapsulating the salient points (and compliant with WP:V and WP:FRINGE); the redirect preserved the article history, as required by the GFDL. Biruitorul Talk 15:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikis Take Manhattan
| Wikis Take Manhattan
|
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.
LAST YEAR'S EVENT
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Spring 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
- Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Gallery (our cool gallery)
WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!
WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.
WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!
REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.
WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:
- 349 W. 12th St. #3
- Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
- By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop
FOR UPDATES
Check out:
- Wikis Take Manhattan main website
This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.
Thanks,
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New Message
[edit] WikiProject Middle East Textbooks Invitation
Michael Safyan (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RfD nomination of D conf
I have nominated D conf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Category:Obama Administration cabinet members
[edit] MMORPG Categories you created
Hello, you created a subcategory for various types of MMORPGs, and then made a few categories. I have a few questions though. What is a "Fantasy societal MMORPG"? All MMORPGs attempt to create "societies" by definition. Also, having a seperate category for MMORPGs in "space" and one for science fiction seems strange, and why an entire category for sports management MMORPGs? I can't imagine many of them exist. Have you participated in the Video Game Wikiproject? You might want to ask them for advice. Thanks! -- Atamachat 16:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. you ask an excellent question. i replied to you at the category talk page. i aprpeciate your input as we get a sense of various ideas on this. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, one idea is to eventually get most articles out of the main MMORPG category, and have each grouped by some better more specifc classification. the sports management category is useful just as a way to provide some genuinely informative categorization for those who are interested in such games and products. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- space is for those like Eve Online which simulate space travel and trading. The sci-fi one is for the many, many other futuristic and/or sci-fi settings which may have nothing to do with space travel itself. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, one idea is to eventually get most articles out of the main MMORPG category, and have each grouped by some better more specifc classification. the sports management category is useful just as a way to provide some genuinely informative categorization for those who are interested in such games and products. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NYC Meetup: You are invited!
| New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Obama Administration personnel
Category:Obama Administration personnel, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Award of a Barnstar
| The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
| The Barnstar of Diligence is hereby awarded in recognition of extraordinary scrutiny, precision, and community service, especially in regard to WP:IPCOLL.
Awarded by PhilKnight (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Draft Restructuring of Wiki I-P Collaboration pages
Hi User:HG and User:Sm8900!:
- Per my recent comments on Wiki I-P Collaboration talk...
- Since you two were most involved in starting these pages, thought I'd get comments from you first before previewed drafts to the group on Monday, Dec 1st, at earliest. Looking at them from the perspective of a busy user who needs to get to the meat of the matter right away, I restructured the WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration pages to make them much simpler and easier to use for myself and hopefully other users. Feel free to comment on the talk pages of those draft articles listed below.
- Sandbox 1: Main page and talk page, with notes on top
- Sandbox 2: Current Article Issues (formerly Community Lounge) which includes "lists" as main page and "discussion" on talk page
- Sandbox 3: Material moved over from the main page which has to be integrated into Battleground statistics. Something which I'll let others do
- (Note that material from current pages would be archived on new pages, as appropriate) Carol Moore 15:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc
- hi carol. thanks so much for your ideas. however, sorry, I will not be online much this weekend, and also I have not been involved enough recently to be able to really give you an ok for this ( though i understand you were only requesting some feedback before showing this to the group anyway).
-
- did you already make these changes? I guess I would suggest discussing these before making any such changes. i really appreciate your message to me though. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- The links are to my sandboxes. Might ask a few other people who were interested in project to comment first also, just to keep down amount of back and forth on easily made changes on the main talk page. Carol Moore 19:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merry Christmas from Promethean
Sm8900,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)
All the Best. «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk)
[edit] reply to promethean
Hi promethean! thanks for writing. happy holidays to you too! it's nice to be appreciated. thanks for writing. feel free to write anytime! thanks. see you! --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of The Flying Neutrinos
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Flying Neutrinos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability highly doubtful and article has not been expanded to take into account concerns
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Deb (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with File:BEGIN1.gif
Thanks for uploading File:BEGIN1.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] You're invited!
| New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).
We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] NYC Meetup: You're invited!
| New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza
|
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.
There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File source problem with File:Usaf unif.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Usaf unif.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Omnibus (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Singapore video game companies
I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Singapore video game companies]] to articles/categories that belong in it.
I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.
If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.
Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tznkai (talk) 04:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] You're invited!
| New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:First-person shooter MOGs
I have nominated Category:First-person shooter MOGs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for renaming to [[:Category:]] ([[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] edit]|[[Category talk:|talk]]|[[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] history]|links|[[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] watch]|logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –xeno (talk) 00:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Categories do not function well as redirects and should typically not be redirected per Wikipedia:CAT#Redirected categories. There are very few incoming links to the category and the deletion log of the category will direct people to the new category. –xeno (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] good cites
article in mother jones magazine:
Salon magazine, pcinemabelnd article fmq article, maj blog posting.
--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Anthropocene
I have nominated Category:Anthropocene (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Atmoz (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] You're invited...
| New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from World Ocean Conference. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 15:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Begin 2
An article that you have been involved in editing, Begin 2, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin 2. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alastairward (talk) 19:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Begin (computer game)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Begin (computer game), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin (computer game). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alastairward (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] new cat today
Category:Naval wargames
[edit] A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for File:Tf 1942 scr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tf 1942 scr.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Chrysler bankruptcy --> Chrysler bankruptcy (2009)
Please next time propose such doubtful, subjective, non-obvious name changes on the talk page first. Then wait some time if no one objects and only then change the name. Andries (talk) 09:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, good point. thanks for the feedback. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] re hello
Hi Sm8900, i am well. I have not really done much editing of IvP articles lately because I have a) been quite busy in real life and b) been editing other topics like finance/economics. I have found editing the latter topics much more enjoyable as generally you don't have to deal with the constant frustration and bias inherent in middle east history topics. Was there anything in particular you would like me to look at? To be honest, having experienced how refreshing it is to edit finance/eco, my motivation to do large scale edits in IvP has waned significantly - although i'll probably randomly make some edits here and there if i feel like it. Regards Suicup (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


