User talk:COMPFUNK2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you have a new message for me, please place it in a new section at the bottom the the page. Thanks! :) THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 22:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] csd
- I don't want to keep going in circles, and it's obvious you don't wish to discuss this further, but I just wanted to add that I never said or implied you were acting in bad faith, just that you are making inaccurate taggings that will be denied simply because they are not valid, even if the subject is not notable. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody said you were editing in bad faith, but the path to hell is paved with good intentions. You can have good faith all you want, but that doesn't automatically make you right. When you have lots of knowledgeable people all pointing out the same issue, you need to accept that the issue is real. Many people have tried to give you advice about proper use of WP:CSD, but you have just ignored all of them and kept on making the same mistakes. --L. Pistachio (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- COMPFUNK: its probably a bad idea to try and archive your talk page in the middle of an ongoing discussion, but no matter. Regarding your edits to the archive, we are not "ganging" up on you, we are offering you some advice, no one is assuming bad faith, we all understand that you are acting in good faith, we know that the mistake was just that: a mistake, and we just pointed it out so that you won't do it by accident again in future, we haven't said that you purposely tagged the articles incorrectly, and I'm sure we all know you didn't SpitfireTally-ho! 19:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody said you were editing in bad faith, but the path to hell is paved with good intentions. You can have good faith all you want, but that doesn't automatically make you right. When you have lots of knowledgeable people all pointing out the same issue, you need to accept that the issue is real. Many people have tried to give you advice about proper use of WP:CSD, but you have just ignored all of them and kept on making the same mistakes. --L. Pistachio (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I am not ignoring advice, I just don't agree with it. Now, if an admin flat-out told me to stop doing something, then that's what I'd do.
- It would really be easier if there were more criteria for speedy deletion. I even tried using {{db-reason}} for something once, and it got declined because the article in question was a "non-notable essay", which wasn't included in CSD criteria. I then asked what was the purpose, then, for that template and received no response.
- And as far as no one ganging up on me, when three or four users come at me within minutes about a certain situation, what else am I supposed to think? THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 19:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamata Charitable Trust
- Thanks for adding your good arguments to the discussion, but may I ask why you removed my nomination and replaced it with your own? The standard procedure is to add your comments below the nominator's. Thanks. Vicenarian (T · C) 15:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just explained on your talk page; it looks like we both put it up for Afd at the same time. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) No problem, we were both working fast. :) Thanks for the clarification. Your nomination statement is better than mine, anyway. I'll add my two cents below. Best, Vicenarian (T · C) 15:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just explained on your talk page; it looks like we both put it up for Afd at the same time. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Network interface device
- Hello. You tagged Network interface device with {{citations missing}}. I recently went through and just about rewrote that article, so I'm familiar with it. I cited sources my at the end. The combined source material is used for the entire article. Did you have a specific complaint? If your objection is the lack of footnotes, I'm not aware of anything that requires every article to be covered in footnotes, and I can cite specific guidance to the contrary. Thanks. —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 17:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not so much of a complaint, but I always tag articles as such that don't have any inline citations, is all. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if there isn't a particular need for them (I don't see one, but I'm of course biased), I'm going to remove the tag from that article. This seems to me to be exactly the sort of "very simple and narrow topic" described in the "General reference" section I cited. • Thanks for the quick response. Cheers! —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 02:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not so much of a complaint, but I always tag articles as such that don't have any inline citations, is all. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] S1B
- I think you do not live in Lebanon to know the success of S1B and their movies! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkk-plz (talk • contribs) 16:38, 22 June 2009
- You might want to read WP:FIRST. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] SMEK2
- fyi, I reverted your redirect at SMEK2. Please discuss on the talk page if you disagree... Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Efeedlink
- I had tagged this article as a copyvio. -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- You did? You don't come up in this history. Ah well. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 05:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know what happened. We edit conflicted. Since we tagged the page at the same time, the tag on the article is credited to you, while the notice is credited to me. Sorry for the confusion. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 05:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Don't sweat it. :) THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 05:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know what happened. We edit conflicted. Since we tagged the page at the same time, the tag on the article is credited to you, while the notice is credited to me. Sorry for the confusion. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 05:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- You did? You don't come up in this history. Ah well. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 05:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] threatening to delete my article
I don't understand why my story ( " AZURA 70s R&R band " )is about to be deemed a hoax. I tried to upload a photo and was denied permission. Even without the photo, what does anyone see in this that would look like a hoax? Who would make up a story about another has-been band from the 70s? It was my band, it was fun, it's gone now, and it had the highly unique name "AZURA". Why do these guys have to pick on me? They can contact me if they want. I have the photos, I have photo ID, what else do they want? Outerrealm (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- What you don't have a independent, reliable sources that indicate how the band is notable by Wikipedia criteria. A Google search for "Jeff Brewer" azura results in two non-relevant pages. ... discospinster talk 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I spoke directly to the person responsible for the hoax accusation, Anthony Rupert, on his facebook page and he refused to answer my questions or respond to my concerns. He threatened to report me to facebook if I messaged him again. I think I may have to escalate this, I think we could do with an outside look at this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.148.30.230 (talk • contribs)
[edit] accused of a hoax
- AZURA the band has not existed since 1977. It doesn't mean it never existed. It simply pre-dated the internet. Jeff Brewer apparently left Holding Pattern, so I have no current info on him. Tony Spada can be found on facebook and he will confirm the prior "existence" of this band. If the problem is insufficient proof of the band's existence I don't see how being accused of perpetrating an "Obvious and blatant hoax" is fair or appropriate
- Leave me alone right now. I'm already in the process of reporting you for harassment. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 23:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Black Cat
- Stop deleting my shit! Your movie isn't real either! I checked on IMDB! There is no Black Cat 2007! So I'll make you a deal...If you stop deleting mine, I won't delete yours! And tell the other guy SelfScrewed to stop too! Now you have to admit that's fair! I'm not not gonna put up with you gay metrosexual! So let's see if we can work this out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.0.40.107 (talk • contribs)
- My movie? What movie? And if you think I deleted "your" page, you're wrong because I'm not an administrator. Also, name-calling is a blatant violation of WP:NPA. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 06:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Metrosexual! Can you please delete your Black Cat (2007) from the Black Cat Film section, for the following reasons! According to imdb, this movie is a Hindu movie, it is an action movie, and it is not a version of Edgar Allan Poe's: The Black Cat! The name of the main character is Black Cat, and this not a version of the Edgar Allan Poe story, and therefor, it does not belong in the Black Cat Film section! Feel free to make a seperate section for this film! If this film is not deleted from the Black Cat Film section, you will receive a penalty resulting in being temporaraly blocked from editing, and it will be deleted for you! Like I said, feel free to have a seperate section for it, but it must be removed from Black Cat Film, because it is not a version of the Edgar Allan Poe story! Thanks for your cooperation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.0.40.107 (talk) 19:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I WARNED YOU!!! Now you have been temporarly blocked from editing Wikipedia! Your block is set to expire July 11, 2009 6:30 P.M. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.0.40.107 (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
