Welcome to fletrix.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Unknown unknown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The term unknown unknown refers to circumstances or outcomes that were not conceived of by an observer at a given point in time. The meaning of the term becomes more clear when it is contrasted with the known unknown, which refers to circumstances or outcomes that are known to be possible, but it is unknown whether or not they will be realized. The term is used in project planning and decision analysis to explain that any model of the future can only be informed by information that is currently available to the observer and, as such, faces substantial limitations and unknown risk.

Contents

[edit] Usage

There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don’t know.

Which seems to be a take on Thoreau: "To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge."[1]

This statement was made at a press briefing given by former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on February 12, 2002. Mr Rumsfeld's statement relating to the increasingly unstable situation in post-invasion Afghanistan was widely viewed as elusive and indicative of arrogance, whilst at the same time reflecting a profound, almost philosophical truth. The statement won the 2003 Foot in Mouth award from the Plain English Campaign,[2] and is also hailed as an example of found poetry.

Rumsfeld's defenders have included Canadian columnist Mark Steyn, who called it 'in fact a brilliant distillation of quite a complex matter',[3] and Australian economist and blogger John Quiggin, who wrote that, 'Although the language may be tortured, the basic point is both valid and important ... Having defended Rumsfeld, I’d point out that the considerations he refers to provide the case for being very cautious in going to war.'[4]

Italian economists Salvatore Modica and Aldo Rustichini provide an introduction to the economic literature on awareness and unawareness

A subject is certain of something when he knows that thing; he is uncertain when he does not know it, but he knows he does not: he is consciously uncertain. On the other hand, he is unaware of something when he does not know it, and he does not know he does not know [emphasis added], and so on ad infinitum: he does not perceive, does not have in mind, the object of knowledge. The opposite of unawareness is awareness.[5]

Psychoanalytic philosopher Slavoj Zizek extrapolates from these three categories a fourth, the unknown known, that which we don't know or intentionally refuse to acknowledge that we know:[6]

If Rumsfeld thinks that the main dangers in the confrontation with Iraq were the "unknown unknowns," that is, the threats from Saddam whose nature we cannot even suspect, then the Abu Ghraib scandal shows that the main dangers lie in the "unknown knowns" - the disavowed beliefs, suppositions and obscene practices we pretend not to known about, even though they form the background of our public values.

The term was in use within the United States military establishment long before Rumsfeld's quote to the press in 2002. An early use of the term comes from a paper entitled Clausewitz and Modern War Gaming: losing can be better than winning by Raymond B. Furlong, Lieutenant General, USAF (Ret.) in the Air University Review, July-August 1984:

To those things Clausewitz wrote about uncertainty and chance, I would add a few comments on unknown unknowns--those things that a commander doesn't even know he doesn't know. Participants in a war game would describe an unknown unknown as unfair, beyond the ground rules of the game. But real war does not follow ground rules, and I would urge that games be "unfair" by introducing unknown unknowns.[7]
NASA space exploration should largely address a problem class in reliability and risk management stemming primarily from human error, system risk and multi-objective trade-off analysis, by conducting research into system complexity, risk characterization and modeling, and system reasoning. In general, in every mission we can distinguish risk in three possible ways: a) known-known, b) known-unknown, and c)unknown-unknown. It is probable, almost certain, that space exploration will partially experience similar known or unknown risks embedded in the Apollo missions, Shuttle or Station unless something alters how NASA will perceive and manage safety and reliability. [8]

From the same time, conservative lawyer Richard Epstein wrote a well known article in the University of Chicago Law Review about the American labour law doctrine of employment at will (the idea that workers can be fired without warning or reason, unless their contract states terms that are better). In giving some of his reasons in defense of the contract at will, he wrote this.

The contract at will is also a sensible private adaptation to the problem of imperfect information over time. In sharp contrast to the purchase of standard goods, an inspection of the job before acceptance is far less likely to guarantee its quality thereafter. The future is not clearly known. More important, employees, like employers, know what they do not know. They are not faced with a bolt from the blue, with an "unknown unknown." Rather they face a known unknown for which they can plan. The at-will contract is an essential part of that planning because it allows both sides to take a wait-and-see attitude to their relationship so that new and more accurate choices can be made on the strength of improved information.[9]

[edit] Rumsfeld quote in popular culture

Rumsfeld's famous explanation of the unknown unknown has been variously skewered by his critics in popular media.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Henry David Thoreau Quotes and Quotations". http://www.famousquotesandauthors.com/authors/henry_david_thoreau_quotes.html. Retrieved on 2009-06-28. 
  2. ^ "Foot in Mouth". http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/foot_in_mouth_award/past_winners.html. Retrieved on 2007-12-17. 
  3. ^ "Rummy speaks the truth, not gobbledygook, Daily Telegraph, December 9, 2003". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/12/09/do0902.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2003/12/09/ixopinion.html. Retrieved on 2008-10-30. 
  4. ^ "In Defense of Rumsfeld, johnquiggin.com, February 10, 2004". http://johnquiggin.com/index.php/archives/2004/02/10/in-defense-of-rumsfeld/. Retrieved on 2008-10-30. 
  5. ^ "Salvatore Modica and Aldo Rustichini, Awareness and partitional information structures, Theory and Decision, Volume 37, Number 1 / July, 1994". http://www.springerlink.com/content/l32r06103403mv1v/. 
  6. ^ {cite web |url=http://www.lacan.com/zizekrumsfeld.htm |title=What Rumsfeld Doesn't Know That He Knows About Abu Ghraib |accessdate=2009-2-23|format= |work=}}
  7. ^ "Air University Review Archive at Air & Space Power Journal". http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1984/jul-aug/furlong.html. Retrieved on 2008-08-14. 
  8. ^ "Maluf, Gawdiak, and Bell, ON SPACE EXPLORATION AND HUMAN ERROR: A paper on reliability and safety, Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, 3-6 Jan. 2005, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, United States". http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060016368_2006006769.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-08-14. 
  9. ^ R Epstein, 'In defense of the contract at will' (1984) 51 University of Chicago Law Review 947, 975

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs