From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cooperatives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
| Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
[edit] Copyright violations
I reverted this edit due to coptyright violations from several sources, including: [1], [2] and [3]. - Akamad 01:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Point of view
This article seems to discuss specific levels of tax break as if they were natural law. Judging by spelling and references to "federal income tax", I presume these levels refer to the USA.
Please remember that Wikipedia is an international encyclopaedia, and as such we cannot assume any specific cultural or political context; these must be stated explicitly. Hairy Dude 02:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestion
So how about putting the general stuff up top (don't think there is any right now - well maybe the Harvard stuff, and I'm not smart enough to make it up on the fly) then cram the current article into a heading US Employee-Owned Corporations —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.66.120.135 (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC).
I removed some of the financial details from the intro and added information on the pros and cons of employee ownership, which I thought would be of high general interest. I also broke "advantages" into advantages for employees and advantages to the company as a whole, since they seem to be fairly distinct topics in this context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhumandecency (talk • contribs) 20:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Page name wrong
This page is called employee-owned corporations, but then it says it's about companies owned in part by employees. This is just a bit silly. If it's employee owned, that means it's all employee owned. Otherwise it's like just about any company on the planet. Companies almost always have employees owning a small stake, directly or indirectly. I think there needs to be a separate page too for ESOPs, i.e. Employee Share Ownership Plans. This is nothing to do with Employee owned companies. Thoughts? Wikidea 16:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed - it seems too much of a mish mash, but as of today the pieces seem too short to split out on their own. To add more confusion to the mix, I recall that there was a time when the term ESOP was used in the UK for management-employee buyouts. However, if you see a need for a split, I think you should just go ahead and do it. Most of this article could be moved to a generic article called Employee ownership --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have read it again, and I think the domoniance of the article is about Employee ownership or Employee stock ownership, not at all about the Employee-owned corporation often called the Employee-owned company. I think it is time for a move, and to start another article at this title. Wik, I think you should go ahead and move to one of those titles. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 08:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
