Welcome to fletrix.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Diagram (category theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Category of diagrams)
Jump to: navigation, search

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a diagram is the categorical analogue of a indexed family in set theory. The primary difference is that in the categorical setting one has morphisms as well: an indexed family of sets is a collection of sets, indexed by a fixed set (equivalently, a function from a fixed index set to the class of sets), while a diagram is a collection of objects and morphisms, indexed by a fixed category (equivalently, a functor from a fixed index category to some category). Formally, a diagram is an element of a functor category.

Diagrams are used in the definition of limit and colimits and the related notion of cones.

Contents

[edit] Definition

Formally, a diagram of type J in a category C is a functor

D : JC

The category J is called the index category or the scheme of the diagram D. The actual objects and morphisms in J are largely irrelevant, only the way in which they are interrelated matters. The diagram D is thought of as indexing a collection of objects and morphisms in C patterned on J.

Although, technically, there is no difference between an individual diagram and a functor or between a scheme and a category, the change in terminology reflects a change in perspective, just as in the set theoretic case: one fixes the index category, and allows the functor (and, secondarily, the target category) to vary.

One is most often interested in the case where the scheme J is a small or even finite. A diagram is said to be small or finite whenever J is.

One may defined a morphism of diagrams of type J in a category C as a natural transformation between functors. One can then interpret the category of diagrams of type J in C as the functor category CJ, and a diagram is then an object in this category.

[edit] Examples

  • If J is a (small) discrete category, then a diagram of type J is essentially just an indexed family of objects in C (indexed by J).
  • If J = 0 \overrightarrow{\to} 1, then a diagram of type J (f,g\colon X \to Y) is called "two parallel morphisms": its limit is an equalizer, and its colimit is a coequalizer.
  • If J = -1 ← 0 → +1, then a diagram of type J (ABC) is a span, and its colimit is a pushout.
  • If J = -1 → 0 ← +1, then a diagram of type J (ABC) is a cospan, and its limit is a pullback.

[edit] Cones and limits

A cone of a diagram D : JC is a morphism from the constant diagram Δ(N) to D. The constant diagram is the diagram which sends every object of J to an object N of C (and every morphism to the identity morphism on N).

The limit of a diagram D is a universal cone to D. That is, a cone through which all other cones uniquely factor. If the limit exists in a category C for all diagrams of type J one obtains a functor

lim : CJC

which sends each diagram to its limit.

Dually, the colimit of diagram D is a universal cone from D. If the colimit exists for all diagrams of type J one has a functor

colim : CJC

which sends each diagram to its colimit.

[edit] Commutative diagrams

Diagrams and functor categories are often visualized by commutative diagrams, particularly if the index category is a finite poset category with few elements: one draws a commutative diagram with a node for every object in the index category, and an arrow for a generating set of morphisms, omitting identity maps and morphisms that can be expressed as compositions. The commutativity corresponds to the uniqueness of a map between two objects in a poset category. Conversely, every commutative diagram represents as diagram (a functor from a poset index category) in this way.

Not every diagram commutes, as not every index category is a poset category: most simply, the diagram of a single object with an endomorphism (f\colon X \to X), or with two parallel arrows (\bullet \overrightarrow{\to} \bullet; f,g\colon X \to Y) need not commute. Further, diagrams may be impossible (because infinite) or messy (because many objects or morphisms) to draw; however, schematic commutative diagrams (for subcategories of the index category, or with ellipses, such as for a directed system) are used to clarify such complex diagrams.

[edit] See also

[edit] Limits

[edit] Examples

[edit] References

Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs